George H. Ford

566 citations
16 papers · 89 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (5 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers)History, Medicine, and Leadership (2 papers)
Journals
NOVEL A Forum on FictionModern PhilologyMedical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

George H. Ford

8 papers receiving 49 citations

Peers

George H. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Literature and Literary Theory 26
  • Ecology 17
  • Paleontology 11
  • Demography 11
  • Global and Planetary Change 11
Replace Arthur Smith Woodward with:
Arthur Smith Woodward Italy
Thomas Hariot
Heinrich Heine
Walter Hamilton United States
Christopher Columbus
Joyce E. Salisbury United States
Martha Warren Beckwith Taiwan
Georges Louis Leclerc Buffon
S. Griswold Morley United States
Erasmus Darwin
George H. Ford relative to Arthur Smith Woodward Italy Arthur Smith Woodward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Arthur Smith Woodward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George H. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George H. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George H. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George H. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George H. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George H. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George H. Ford. The network helps show where George H. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George H. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George H. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George H. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George H. Ford. George H. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Illustrations of the zoology of South Africa
35
2
Hard times : an authoritative text, backgrounds, sources, and contemporary reactions, criticism
0
3
Wild, Wild Hair
2
4 3
5 0
6 1
7 0
8 5
9
Double measure. A study of the novels and stories of D.H. Lawrence.
1
10 0
11
The Dickens critics
8
12 2
13
Dickens and His Readers: Aspects of Novel-Criticism Since 1836
25
14 0
15 6
16 1

About George H. Ford

George H. Ford is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Demography and Anthropology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 89 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (5 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and History, Medicine, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Paleontology (11 citations). Frequent co-authors include M. Murray, W Macleay, Andrew Smith, Stewart, Hyder E. Rollins, Frank Kermode, Charles Dickens and Colin Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, Modern Philology and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026