George Geier

502 total citations
4 papers, 347 citations indexed

About

George Geier is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, George Geier has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 347 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Neurology and 1 paper in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in George Geier's work include Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper). George Geier is often cited by papers focused on Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper). George Geier collaborates with scholars based in United States. George Geier's co-authors include Randall G. Rowland, John P. Donohue, R. Bihrle, Richard S. Foster, Jeffrey A. Jones, Kenyon K. Kopecky, Patrick J. Loehrer, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Stephen D. Williams and Christopher P. Steidle and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

George Geier

4 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

George Geier
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Surgery 325
  • Reproductive Medicine 119
  • Rheumatology 114
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 100
  • Neurology 75
Replace Roy W. Skoglund with:
Roy W. Skoglund United States
David M. Woodhead United States
Gill Humphrey United Kingdom
Gerard Del Junco United States
Ronald A. Rubenstein United States
April A. Bailey United States
Patrick Davol United States
Hans Lampe Germany
Alexandra Ntorkou Greece
Donald J. Mehan United States
Roy W. Skoglund United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to George Geier
George Geier · 1×
Citations per year, relative to George Geier
George Geier · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by George Geier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Geier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Geier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Geier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Geier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Geier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Geier. The network helps show where George Geier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Geier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Geier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Geier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Geier. George Geier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 204
2 132
3
Villous adenoma of the duodenum. A clinicopathologic study of five cases.
6
4
[Treatment of motor urge incontinence with the beta 2-sympathomimetic drug clenbuterol (author's transl)].
5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026