George Galambos
About
In The Last Decade
George Galambos
5 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Information Systems 152
- Management Information Systems 129
- Artificial Intelligence 74
- Marketing 43
- Computer Networks and Communications 37
Countries citing papers authored by George Galambos
This map shows the geographic impact of George Galambos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Galambos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Galambos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Galambos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Galambos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Galambos. The network helps show where George Galambos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Galambos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Galambos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Galambos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Galambos. George Galambos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 179 | |
| 4 | Patterns for e-Business: A Strategy for Reuse | 44 |
| 5 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.