George F. Field
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 8
- Quinazolinone synthesis and applications 8
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 3
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 3
- Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives 2
- Biophysics top 10%
-
- Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities 7
- bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 3
-
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism 2
- Co-authors
- Emil H. WhiteFrank McCapraW. D. McElroyLeo H. SternbachPeter YatesH. H. SeligerL. H. SternbachR. Ian Fryer
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (6 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
George F. Field
27 papers receiving 665 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 235
- Organic Chemistry 263
- Biophysics 48
- Molecular Biology 494
- Pharmaceutical Science 27
Countries citing papers authored by George F. Field
This map shows the geographic impact of George F. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George F. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George F. Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George F. Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George F. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George F. Field. The network helps show where George F. Field may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside George F. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1971 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1969 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1966 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 61 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 240 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 62 | |
| 19 | 1961 | 139 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 22 |
About George F. Field
George F. Field is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (8 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (8 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (7 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (3 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers) and Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (235 citations), Organic Chemistry (263 citations) and Biophysics (48 citations). George F. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Emil H. White, Frank McCapra, W. D. McElroy, Leo H. Sternbach, Peter Yates, H. H. Seliger, L. H. Sternbach, R. Ian Fryer, John F. Blount and James V. Earley. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.