George Emmanuel

714 citations
11 papers · 526 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

George Emmanuel

11 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

George Emmanuel
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
  • Immunology 152
  • Epidemiology 191
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 127
Replace Dazhe Wang with:
Dazhe Wang United States
Taswell Hf United States
Shapiro Mj United States
Slotman Gj United States
Jeff Morçet France
F Streiff France
Rackow Ec United States
A.J. Karlish United Kingdom
G. Pilz Germany
Rush Bf United States
George Emmanuel relative to Dazhe Wang United States Dazhe Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Dazhe Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Emmanuel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Emmanuel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Emmanuel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Emmanuel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Emmanuel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Emmanuel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Emmanuel. The network helps show where George Emmanuel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Emmanuel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Emmanuel Line = papers co-authored together George Emmanuel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1994352
2 197775
3 197623
4 199019
5 199113
6 196911
7 196711
8 199010
9 19908
10 19723
11 19711

About George Emmanuel

George Emmanuel is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations), Immunology (152 citations), Epidemiology (191 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (93 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (127 citations). George Emmanuel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Steven M. Opal, Duane C. Bloedow, Charles J. Fisher, David P. Ng, John P. Pribble, Roger C. Bone, Gus J. Slotman, Michael A. Catalano, David S. Kaplan and Herman Ellman. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, The Lancet and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact