Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GENETIC CONTROL OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE
1972248 citationsHugh O. McDevitt, Beverly D. Deak et al.The Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by George D. Snell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George D. Snell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George D. Snell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George D. Snell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George D. Snell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George D. Snell. The network helps show where George D. Snell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George D. Snell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George D. Snell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George D. Snell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George D. Snell. George D. Snell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Snell, George D.. (1992). Studies in Histocompatihility. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 36(4). 514–525.61 indexed citations
2.
Snell, George D.. (1980). The major histocompatibility complex: its evolution and involvement in cellular immunity.. PubMed. 74. 49–80.11 indexed citations
McDevitt, Hugh O., Beverly D. Deak, Donald C. Shreffler, et al.. (1972). GENETIC CONTROL OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 135(6). 1259–1278.248 indexed citations breakdown →
Snell, George D. & J. H. Stimpfling. (1966). Genetics of tissue transplantation.. The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory). 457.75 indexed citations
Green, Margaret C., George D. Snell, & PRISCILLA W. LANE. (1963). LINKAGE GROUP XVIII OF THE MOUSE. Journal of Heredity. 54(5). 245–247.10 indexed citations
13.
Snell, George D. & Leroy C. Stevens. (1961). Histocompatibility genes of mice. III. H-1 and H-4, two histocompatibility loci in the first linkage group.. PubMed Central. 4. 366–79.85 indexed citations
Snell, George D., Joan Staats, Mary F. Lyon, et al.. (1960). Standardized Nomenclature for Inbred Strains of Mice Second Listing Prepared by The Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. Cancer Research. 20(2). 145–169.33 indexed citations
Snell, George D.. (1957). THE GENETICS OF TRANSPLANTATION. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 69(4). 555–560.46 indexed citations
18.
Snell, George D.. (1956). The suppression of the enhancing effect in mice by the addition of donor lymph nodes to the tumor inoculum.. The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.