The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.
- Authors
- George D. Snell
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89093156 →Countries where authors are citing The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.
This map shows the geographic impact of The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.
This network shows the impact of The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism..
About The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism.
This paper, published in 1968, received 188 indexed citations . Written by George D. Snell. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (106 citations), Genetics (54 citations) and Molecular Biology (41 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89093156.