George C. Philip
- Management Information Systems top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering top 1%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Topics
- Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers)Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Information SystemsStrategy and ManagementIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Journals
- Expert Systems with ApplicationsPowder TechnologyJournal of the Association for Information Systems
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George C. Philip
15 papers receiving 855 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Management Information Systems 833
- Strategy and Management 651
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 326
- Control and Systems Engineering 154
- Management Science and Operations Research 102
Countries citing papers authored by George C. Philip
This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Philip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Philip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Philip. The network helps show where George C. Philip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Philip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Philip. George C. Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing. | 19 |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 239 | |
| 15 | An EOQ Model for Items with Weibull Distribution Deteriorationbreakdown → | 629 |
About George C. Philip
George C. Philip is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and Management and Computer Science Applications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (833 citations), Strategy and Management (651 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (326 citations). George C. Philip has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark T. Dishaw, Jakob Iversen, A.F. Vetter and J.K. Beddow. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Powder Technology and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.