George C. Philip

20 total papers · 1.3k total citations
15 papers, 974 citations indexed

About

George C. Philip is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, George C. Philip has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 974 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in George C. Philip's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers). George C. Philip is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers). George C. Philip collaborates with scholars based in United States. George C. Philip's co-authors include Mark T. Dishaw, Jakob Iversen, J.K. Beddow and A.F. Vetter and has published in prestigious journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Powder Technology.

In The Last Decade

George C. Philip

15 papers receiving 849 citations

Hit Papers

An EOQ Model for Items wi... 1973 2026 1990 2008 1973 200 400 600

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
George C. Philip 833 649 326 154 102 15 974
Matthew J. Drake 434 0.5× 304 0.5× 155 0.5× 45 0.3× 86 0.8× 37 833
Ehsan Shekarian 451 0.5× 591 0.9× 141 0.4× 121 0.8× 165 1.6× 26 899
Yacine Rekik 527 0.6× 313 0.5× 448 1.4× 65 0.4× 98 1.0× 39 1.0k
Awaluddin Mohamed Shaharoun 429 0.5× 591 0.9× 247 0.8× 117 0.8× 143 1.4× 50 1.2k
Nima Kazemi 624 0.7× 737 1.1× 159 0.5× 185 1.2× 222 2.2× 26 1.1k
Roelof Kuik 643 0.8× 428 0.7× 528 1.6× 88 0.6× 139 1.4× 26 1.2k
Ahmet Şatır 486 0.6× 452 0.7× 187 0.6× 82 0.5× 114 1.1× 30 835
Natalie Simpson 393 0.5× 253 0.4× 379 1.2× 114 0.7× 127 1.2× 30 947
Anthony Ross 495 0.6× 476 0.7× 223 0.7× 84 0.5× 301 3.0× 31 1.1k
Tsu-Pang Hsieh 860 1.0× 620 1.0× 281 0.9× 107 0.7× 115 1.1× 25 963

Countries citing papers authored by George C. Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Philip. The network helps show where George C. Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Philip. George C. Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026