George Berry

3.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
10 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

George Berry is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, George Berry has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Communication, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in George Berry's work include Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). George Berry is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). George Berry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. George Berry's co-authors include P. Armitage, J. N. S. Matthews, C Wickham, Gary J. Sipps, Sean J. Taylor, E. J. Hannan, Michael Genkin, Matthew E. Brashears, Cheng Wang and Chen Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biometrics and Journal of Counseling Psychology.

In The Last Decade

George Berry

9 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1988 2026 2000 2013 2002 1988 400 800 1.2k

Peers

George Berry
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Surgery 388
  • Epidemiology 373
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 309
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 304
  • Oncology 254
Replace Chris Patterson with:
Chris Patterson United Kingdom
Carmén Cadarso-Suárez Spain
Anne Whitehead United Kingdom
Rashmi Ravindran Nair Canada
Joachim Härtung Germany
John N. S. Matthews United Kingdom
D. Riley United States
G. Lu United Kingdom
Jane L. Hutton United Kingdom
Chang Xu China
Chris Patterson United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to George Berry
George Berry · 1×
Citations per year, relative to George Berry
George Berry · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by George Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Berry. The network helps show where George Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Berry. George Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 21
4
Blaunet 2.0.1: Calculate and analyze Blau status for measuring social distance
1
5
Statistical Methods in Medical Research breakdown →
1320
6 172
7 13
8 11
9
Statistical Methods in Medical Research. breakdown →
1294
10 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026