Joachim Härtung

5.2k citations
51 papers · 3.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 19

Joachim Härtung

48 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with ...1.5k200320262010201850010001.5k

Peers

Joachim Härtung
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Statistics and Probability 589
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 490
  • Clinical Psychology 377
  • Applied Psychology 78
  • Genetics 141
Replace Lidia R. Arends with:
Lidia R. Arends Netherlands
Ralf Bender Germany
D G Altman United Kingdom
Aiyi Liu United States
Jelle J. Goeman Netherlands
Oliver Kuß Germany
Charles Poole United Kingdom
Thomas Lumley New Zealand
Lifeng Lin United States
Stefan Wellek Germany
Joachim Härtung relative to Lidia R. Arends Netherlands Lidia R. Arends's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Lidia R. Arends · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Härtung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Härtung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Härtung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Härtung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Härtung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Härtung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Härtung. The network helps show where Joachim Härtung may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Härtung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Härtung Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Härtung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2015156
2 2008300
3 200670
4 20068
5 20065
6 20055
7
Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariatebreakdown →
20031525
8 200320
9 200225
10 20010
11 2001313
12 20017
13 200157
14 20001
15 199911
16 19981
17 19971
18 198926
19
Hypothesenprüfung im restringierten linearen Modell : Theorie und Anwendungen
19847
20 198216

About Joachim Härtung

Joachim Härtung is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Numerical Analysis, having authored 51 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (16 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (12 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (9 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (6 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (5 papers) and Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (589 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (490 citations) and Clinical Psychology (377 citations). Joachim Härtung has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Kenya and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guido Knapp, Bimal K. Sinha, Kepher H. Makambi, Brad J. Biggerstaff, Markus Stücker, Peter Altmeyer, Matthias Hoffmann, F. Bach, Joachim P. Steinbach and H. Maximilian Mehdorn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Gastroenterology and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026