George A. De Vos
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lola Romanucci‐RossHiroshi WagatsumaToyomasa FuséWilliam CaudillMarcelo M. Suàrez‐OrozcoTamotsu ShibutaniWilliam P. LebraTakeyuki Tsuda
- Topics
- Japanese History and Culture (7 papers)Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (2 papers)Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George A. De Vos
25 papers receiving 662 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Sociology and Political Science 290
- Social Psychology 226
- Clinical Psychology 168
- Psychiatry and Mental health 161
- Education 136
Countries citing papers authored by George A. De Vos
This map shows the geographic impact of George A. De Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George A. De Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George A. De Vos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George A. De Vos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George A. De Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George A. De Vos. The network helps show where George A. De Vos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George A. De Vos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George A. De Vos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George A. De Vos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George A. De Vos. George A. De Vos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Ethnic identity : problems and prospects for the twenty-first century | 25 |
| 3 | Cross-cultural dimensions in conscious thought : narrative themes in comparative context | 4 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 62 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | Japan's minorities : burakumin, Koreans and Ainu and Okinawans | 7 |
| 14 | 243 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Japan's Minorities: Burakumin, Koreans and Ainu | 3 |
| 19 | 107 | |
| 20 | Themes in Japanese society as seen through the Japanese film | 2 |
About George A. De Vos
George A. De Vos is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Occupational Therapy and Finance, having authored 28 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (226 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (161 citations) and Cultural Studies (73 citations). George A. De Vos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lola Romanucci‐Ross, Hiroshi Wagatsuma, Toyomasa Fusé, William Caudill, Marcelo M. Suàrez‐Orozco, Tamotsu Shibutani, William P. Lebra, Takeyuki Tsuda, Kōji Taira and Kazuo Yamaguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Anthropologist and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.