Georg Groth

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
84 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Georg Groth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Georg Groth has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Molecular Biology, 34 papers in Plant Science and 5 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Georg Groth's work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (27 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (25 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (22 papers). Georg Groth is often cited by papers focused on Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (27 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (25 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (22 papers). Georg Groth collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Georg Groth's co-authors include Melanie M. A. Bisson, Ehmke Pohl, Daniel Schlieper, Caren Chang, Wolfgang Junge, Jianhong Chang, Mark L. Tucker, Chuanli Ju, David Yin-wei Lin and Joseph J. Kieber and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Georg Groth

83 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Georg Groth Germany 26 1.3k 1.3k 74 59 56 84 2.2k
Thorsten Seidel Germany 26 743 0.6× 1.0k 0.8× 53 0.7× 48 0.8× 87 1.6× 45 1.7k
Michael Wrzaczek Finland 22 2.0k 1.6× 1.2k 1.0× 40 0.5× 49 0.8× 90 1.6× 33 2.4k
Marcelo Desimone Germany 17 1.5k 1.1× 1.3k 1.0× 52 0.7× 30 0.5× 56 1.0× 21 1.9k
Michaël Moulin United Kingdom 18 803 0.6× 875 0.7× 142 1.9× 75 1.3× 47 0.8× 19 1.5k
Miriam Laxa Germany 17 1.2k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 43 0.6× 56 0.9× 57 1.0× 19 2.0k
Terence A. Walsh United States 23 845 0.7× 1000 0.8× 62 0.8× 48 0.8× 129 2.3× 31 1.7k
Stephan Wagner Germany 22 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 58 0.8× 73 1.2× 87 1.6× 38 1.9k
Sandra K. Tanz Australia 19 894 0.7× 1.8k 1.5× 89 1.2× 25 0.4× 57 1.0× 24 2.1k
Michaela Sedlářová Czechia 22 940 0.7× 661 0.5× 57 0.8× 64 1.1× 180 3.2× 76 1.5k
Valérie Collin France 16 540 0.4× 1.4k 1.1× 74 1.0× 73 1.2× 111 2.0× 23 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Georg Groth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Georg Groth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georg Groth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georg Groth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Georg Groth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georg Groth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georg Groth. The network helps show where Georg Groth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georg Groth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georg Groth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georg Groth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Georg Groth. Georg Groth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Mehdi, Saher, Beatriz Orosa‐Puente, Charles W.E. Tomlinson, et al.. (2025). POLARIS is a copper-binding peptide that interacts with ETR1 to negatively regulate ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Communications. 6(12). 101432–101432. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schott‐Verdugo, Stephan, et al.. (2024). Structure and dimerization properties of the plant-specific copper chaperone CCH. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 19099–19099. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lü, Jian, Chi‐Kuang Wen, & Georg Groth. (2022). New Insights into Phase Separation Processes and Membraneless Condensates of EIN2. Plants. 11(16). 2149–2149. 7 indexed citations
5.
Müller, Lena, et al.. (2022). Mapping the helix arrangement of the reconstituted ETR1 ethylene receptor transmembrane domain by EPR spectroscopy. RSC Advances. 12(12). 7352–7356. 5 indexed citations
6.
Sauer, Daniel F., Ulrich Markel, Johannes Schiffels, et al.. (2021). Chemogenetic engineering of nitrobindin toward an artificial epoxygenase. Catalysis Science & Technology. 11(13). 4491–4499. 5 indexed citations
7.
Kawamoto, Nozomi, Dunia Pino Del Carpio, Alexander Hofmann, et al.. (2020). A Peptide Pair Coordinates Regular Ovule Initiation Patterns with Seed Number and Fruit Size. Current Biology. 30(22). 4352–4361.e4. 45 indexed citations
8.
Dijk, Erik van, Alexander Hofmann, Georg Groth, et al.. (2020). The hydrophobic effect characterises the thermodynamic signature of amyloid fibril growth. PLoS Computational Biology. 16(5). e1007767–e1007767. 37 indexed citations
9.
Müller, Lena, Sebastian Hänsch, D. Milić, et al.. (2019). Soluble and membrane-bound protein carrier mediate direct copper transport to the ethylene receptor family. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 10715–10715. 20 indexed citations
10.
Schott‐Verdugo, Stephan, et al.. (2019). Structural Model of the ETR1 Ethylene Receptor Transmembrane Sensor Domain. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 8869–8869. 36 indexed citations
11.
12.
Müller, Lena, et al.. (2017). Novel Protein-Protein Inhibitor Based Approach to Control Plant Ethylene Responses: Synthetic Peptides for Ripening Control. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8. 1528–1528. 19 indexed citations
13.
Groth, Georg, et al.. (2017). Small-molecule inhibition of pyruvate phosphate dikinase targeting the nucleotide binding site. PLoS ONE. 12(7). e0181139–e0181139. 9 indexed citations
14.
Bisson, Melanie M. A., Lena Müller, Alexander Hofmann, et al.. (2016). Peptides interfering with protein-protein interactions in the ethylene signaling pathway delay tomato fruit ripening. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 30634–30634. 26 indexed citations
15.
Nguyen, Giang Thi Tuyet, Ortrud Jäck, Andreas Küberl, et al.. (2016). Chalcone-based Selective Inhibitors of a C4 Plant Key Enzyme as Novel Potential Herbicides. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 27333–27333. 16 indexed citations
16.
Eßer, Christian, et al.. (2014). Plant and Animal Glycolate Oxidases Have a Common Eukaryotic Ancestor and Convergently Duplicated to Evolve Long-Chain 2-Hydroxy Acid Oxidases. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 31(5). 1089–1101. 45 indexed citations
17.
Ju, Chuanli, Gyeong Mee Yoon, David Yin-wei Lin, et al.. (2012). CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control ethylene hormone signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(47). 19486–19491. 468 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Vollmar, M., et al.. (2009). Structure of the c14 Rotor Ring of the Proton Translocating Chloroplast ATP Synthase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 284(27). 18228–18235. 99 indexed citations
19.
Forrest, Lucy R., Georg Groth, & Mark S.P. Sansom. (2001). Simulation studies on subunit C from F0F1-ATPase in different solvents. Biophysical Journal. 80. 1 indexed citations
20.
Groth, Georg & Ehmke Pohl. (2001). The Structure of the Chloroplast F1-ATPase at 3.2 Å Resolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(2). 1345–1352. 93 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026