Daniel Schlieper

965 citations
20 papers · 678 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schlieper

20 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Daniel Schlieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Cell Biology 192
  • Structural Biology 12
  • Molecular Biology 462
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Aging 6
Replace Eva Kummer with:
Eva Kummer Switzerland
Johannes F. Hevler Netherlands
Sara Alvira Spain
Kayako Nakamura Japan
Dean Fraga United States
Xiao-Feng Tan United States
Sebastian Hänsch Germany
Eugenia M. Clérico United States
Akiko Yamaji‐Hasegawa Japan
Sebastiaan Werten Germany
Daniel Schlieper relative to Eva Kummer Switzerland Eva Kummer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eva Kummer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schlieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schlieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schlieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schlieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schlieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schlieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schlieper. The network helps show where Daniel Schlieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schlieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schlieper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schlieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2005155
2 2005117
3 2002109
4 200999
5 201366
6 202040
7 201719
8 199815
9 201214
10 20226
11 20156
12 20225
13 20225
14 20235
15 19974
16 20204
17 20173
18 20233
19 20212
20 20031

About Daniel Schlieper

Daniel Schlieper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Ecology and Cell Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (192 citations), Structural Biology (12 citations), Molecular Biology (462 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Daniel Schlieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Linda Amos, Georg Groth, Siniša Urban, Matthew Freeman, José M. Andreu, María A. Oliva, Jan Löwe, Judith K. Paulus, M. Vollmar and Martyn Winn. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Palliative Care, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications, Current Biology and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact