Geoffrey Grammer

23 papers receiving 852 citations

Hit Papers

The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment R...20162026201920222016100200300400

Peers

Geoffrey Grammer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Neurology 498
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 307
  • Clinical Psychology 262
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 245
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 131
Replace Christopher A. Wall with:
Christopher A. Wall United States
Paul Zarkowski United States
Ying-Chiao Lee Taiwan
Natasha Marston Australia
David G. Brock United States
Christina W. Slotema Netherlands
Wolfgang Strube Germany
Stephan Goerigk Germany
Danielle Cooke United States
Sinéad Quinn United States
Geoffrey Grammer relative to Christopher A. Wall United States Christopher A. Wall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christopher A. Wall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Grammer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Grammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Grammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Grammer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Grammer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Grammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Grammer. The network helps show where Geoffrey Grammer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Grammer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Grammer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Grammer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Grammer. Geoffrey Grammer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 15
3 27
4 6
5 26
6 24
7 23
8
The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment Recommendations for TMS Therapy for Major Depressive Disorderbreakdown →
428
9 26
10 26
11 18
12 32
13 2
14 2
15 13
16 123
17 14
18 12
19
Escitalopram-associated mania.
2
20 6

About Geoffrey Grammer

Geoffrey Grammer is a scholar working on Neurology, Clinical Psychology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (498 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (131 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (245 citations). Geoffrey Grammer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Mark S. George, Tarique D. Perera, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Philip G. Janicak, Kathy Williams, Marjan Ghahramanlou‐Holloway, Kanchana U. Perera, Michael N. Dretsch, Joseph Bleiberg and Thomas J. DeGraba. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026