Colleen A. Hanlon
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark S. GeorgeLogan T. DowdleLinda J. PorrinoMelanie CanterberryMichael J. WesleyXingbao LiKathleen T. BradyKaren J. Hartwell
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (48 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (42 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (31 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Colleen A. Hanlon
96 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
- Neurology 1.2k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 600
- Clinical Psychology 419
- Neurology 387
Countries citing papers authored by Colleen A. Hanlon
This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen A. Hanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen A. Hanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen A. Hanlon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen A. Hanlon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen A. Hanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen A. Hanlon. The network helps show where Colleen A. Hanlon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen A. Hanlon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen A. Hanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen A. Hanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen A. Hanlon. Colleen A. Hanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 126 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 148 | |
| 19 | 61 | |
| 20 | 105 |
About Colleen A. Hanlon
Colleen A. Hanlon is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (48 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (42 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (600 citations). Colleen A. Hanlon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mark S. George, Logan T. Dowdle, Linda J. Porrino, Melanie Canterberry, Michael J. Wesley, Xingbao Li, Kathleen T. Brady, Karen J. Hartwell, Jeffrey J. Borckardt and Daniel M. McCalley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.