Gene Callahan
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Demography
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and EconometricsPolitical Science and International Relations
- Journals
- American Journal of Economics and SociologyReview of Political EconomyInternational Journal of Social Economics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gene Callahan
22 papers receiving 169 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Economics and Econometrics 85
- Political Science and International Relations 58
- Sociology and Political Science 47
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36
- Demography 26
Countries citing papers authored by Gene Callahan
This map shows the geographic impact of Gene Callahan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene Callahan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene Callahan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gene Callahan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene Callahan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene Callahan. The network helps show where Gene Callahan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gene Callahan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gene Callahan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gene Callahan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gene Callahan. Gene Callahan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | The Paradox of Coase as a Defender of Free Markets | 8 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Hans-Herman Hoppe's argumentation ethic: A critique | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Gene Callahan
Gene Callahan is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (36 citations), Economics and Econometrics (85 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (58 citations). Gene Callahan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger W. Garrison, Walter E. Block, William Barnett, Robert Murphy and Peter T. Leeson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Review of Political Economy and International Journal of Social Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.