Gena Lewis
About
In The Last Decade
Gena Lewis
2 papers receiving 215 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- General Health Professions 151
- Clinical Psychology 61
- Health 38
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 33
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 31
Countries citing papers authored by Gena Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Gena Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gena Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gena Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gena Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gena Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gena Lewis. The network helps show where Gena Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gena Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gena Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gena Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gena Lewis. Gena Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Screening for Social Determinants of Health Among Children and Families Living in Poverty: A Guide for Clinicians breakdown → | 218 |
| 2 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.