Gen Takeya

432 citations
44 papers · 345 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Gen Takeya

36 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Gen Takeya
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Fuel Technology 62
  • Analytical Chemistry 118
  • Mechanics of Materials 94
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 17
  • Mechanical Engineering 108
Replace S. Parkash with:
S. Parkash Canada
Masataka Makabe Japan
Rafael Cabanzo Colombia
A.J. Merchant United Kingdom
Fred W. Steffgen United States
Zhi-Hao Ma China
Menglong Niu China
Х. М. Кадиев Russia
Kurt Hedden Germany
B. Ignasiak Canada
Gen Takeya relative to S. Parkash Canada S. Parkash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
S. Parkash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gen Takeya

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gen Takeya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gen Takeya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gen Takeya more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gen Takeya

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gen Takeya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gen Takeya. The network helps show where Gen Takeya may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Gen Takeya, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gen Takeya Line = papers co-authored together Gen Takeya links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967118
2 197641
3 197626
4 197919
5 196512
6 19688
7
19758
8 19758
9 19677
10 19727
11 19847
12 19825
13 19725
14 19695
15 19785
16 19725
17 19665
18 19775
19 19744
20
19754

About Gen Takeya

Gen Takeya is a scholar working on Fuel Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coal and Coke Industries Research (18 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (11 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (10 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (8 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (5 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (4 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fuel Technology (62 citations), Analytical Chemistry (118 citations), Mechanics of Materials (94 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (17 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (108 citations). Gen Takeya has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tadao Ishii, Ryoichi Yoshida, Shigeru Ueda, Takuji Hosoi, Hideshi Hattori, H. Itoh, Yosuke Maekawa, K. TANABE, Yūji Yoshida and Mitsuomi Itoh. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel Processing Technology, Fuel, JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, Pure and Applied Chemistry and NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact