Gemma J. Anderson
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Co-authors
- D. D. LucasC. BonfilsJiwoo LeeAndré GonçalvesBaoxiang PanB. K. SpearsRushil AnirudhDavid Seery
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (8 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (6 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Gemma J. Anderson
13 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Global and Planetary Change 119
- Atmospheric Science 105
- Environmental Engineering 56
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 33
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 21
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma J. Anderson
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma J. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma J. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma J. Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma J. Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma J. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma J. Anderson. The network helps show where Gemma J. Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gemma J. Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gemma J. Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gemma J. Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gemma J. Anderson. Gemma J. Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | Identifying and correcting climate projection biases using artificial intelligence | 2 |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Optimal bispectrum constraints on single-field models of inflation | 2 |
| 15 | 13 |
About Gemma J. Anderson
Gemma J. Anderson is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (8 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (105 citations), Global and Planetary Change (119 citations) and Environmental Engineering (56 citations). Gemma J. Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include D. D. Lucas, C. Bonfils, Jiwoo Lee, André Gonçalves, Baoxiang Pan, B. K. Spears, Rushil Anirudh, David Seery, Jim Gaffney and Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Climate, Geophysical Research Letters and Geophysical Journal International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.