Gemma Clayton

93 total papers · 1.3k total citations
40 papers, 632 citations indexed

About

Gemma Clayton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Gemma Clayton has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 632 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 9 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Gemma Clayton's work include Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers). Gemma Clayton is often cited by papers focused on Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers). Gemma Clayton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and France. Gemma Clayton's co-authors include Julian P. T. Higgins, Jelena Savović, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Jonathan A C Sterne, Matthew J. Page, Hayley E Jones, Helene Moustgaard, Mette Frahm Olsen, Lars Jørgensen and David Ruben Teindl Laursen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Gemma Clayton

38 papers receiving 619 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Gemma Clayton	139	107	101	90	85	40	632
Xin Sun	86 0.6×	121 1.1×	85 0.8×	93 1.0×	71 0.8×	21	723
Michael J. Grayling	82 0.6×	132 1.2×	61 0.6×	130 1.4×	85 1.0×	57	728
Μαρία Πετροπούλου	189 1.4×	105 1.0×	46 0.5×	171 1.9×	62 0.7×	18	709
Érica Aranha Suzumura	98 0.7×	53 0.5×	126 1.2×	123 1.4×	116 1.4×	32	701
Diane Heels-Ansdell	172 1.2×	92 0.9×	195 1.9×	159 1.8×	159 1.9×	18	756
John C. Sinclair	95 0.7×	89 0.8×	57 0.6×	61 0.7×	34 0.4×	28	733
Hassan Assareh	61 0.4×	35 0.3×	98 1.0×	105 1.2×	100 1.2×	52	652
Antonio M. Mendes	94 0.7×	53 0.5×	44 0.4×	62 0.7×	77 0.9×	30	687
Thuva Vanniyasingam	70 0.5×	50 0.5×	65 0.6×	155 1.7×	72 0.8×	40	669
Henry C Barry	97 0.7×	67 0.6×	179 1.8×	87 1.0×	32 0.4×	45	776

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Clayton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Clayton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Clayton. The network helps show where Gemma Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gemma Clayton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gemma Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gemma Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gemma Clayton. Gemma Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact