Sonia Barnfield

425 total citations
8 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Sonia Barnfield is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sonia Barnfield has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sonia Barnfield's work include Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Sonia Barnfield is often cited by papers focused on Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Sonia Barnfield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Zimbabwe. Sonia Barnfield's co-authors include Joanna Girling, Andrew Sharp, Kate Duhig, Andrew Shennan, Carolyn Gill, Kate Harding, Nigel Simpson, Jessica Lowe, Rachael Hunter and Asma Khalil and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, BMJ Open and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

In The Last Decade

Sonia Barnfield

6 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sonia Barnfield United Kingdom	4	211	195	43	29	27	8	263
Jo Ficquet United Kingdom	4	225 1.1×	196 1.0×	50 1.2×	25 0.9×	10 0.4×	7	259
Henk A. Bremer Netherlands	10	260 1.2×	241 1.2×	54 1.3×	37 1.3×	6 0.2×	18	314
Cécile Monod Switzerland	6	147 0.7×	65 0.3×	22 0.5×	33 1.1×	21 0.8×	14	198
J. G. Santema Netherlands	7	167 0.8×	183 0.9×	12 0.3×	54 1.9×	23 0.9×	14	325
Hala Abdullahi Qatar	9	94 0.4×	84 0.4×	11 0.3×	30 1.0×	7 0.3×	21	215
Corine M. Koopmans Netherlands	12	303 1.4×	225 1.2×	20 0.5×	97 3.3×	16 0.6×	21	364
P Reif Austria	10	141 0.7×	114 0.6×	12 0.3×	77 2.7×	17 0.6×	30	263
Frances Conti‐Ramsden United Kingdom	8	247 1.2×	211 1.1×	22 0.5×	63 2.2×	7 0.3×	21	298
Danielle M. Panelli United States	9	113 0.5×	158 0.8×	13 0.3×	208 7.2×	17 0.6×	45	323
M Asgharnia Iran	10	94 0.4×	106 0.5×	20 0.5×	125 4.3×	14 0.5×	60	305

Countries citing papers authored by Sonia Barnfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sonia Barnfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sonia Barnfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sonia Barnfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sonia Barnfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sonia Barnfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sonia Barnfield. The network helps show where Sonia Barnfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sonia Barnfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sonia Barnfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sonia Barnfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sonia Barnfield. Sonia Barnfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Davies, Anna, Sheelagh McGuinness, Gemma Clayton, et al.. (2025). Women’s perspectives of decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative antenatal-postnatal paired interview study. BMJ Open. 15(6). e096171–e096171. 3 indexed citations

2.

Davies, Anna, Gemma Clayton, Danya Bakhbakhi, et al.. (2024). Maternity healthcare professionals’ experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 14(4). e080961–e080961. 7 indexed citations

3.

Davies, Anna, Michael Larkin, Lucy Willis, et al.. (2024). A qualitative exploration of women’s expectations of birth and knowledge of birth interventions following antenatal education. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 24(1). 875–875. 1 indexed citations

4.

Davies, Anna, M.B. Lynch, Rachel Plachcinski, et al.. (2024). Cross Sectional Survey of Antenatal Educators’ Views About Current Antenatal Education Provision. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 28(9). 1520–1529. 1 indexed citations

5.

Duhig, Kate, Jenny Myers, Paul T. Seed, et al.. (2019). Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 393(10183). 1807–1818. 203 indexed citations

6.

Crofts, Joanna F., Solwayo Ngwenya, Cathy Winter, et al.. (2015). Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 93(5). 347–351. 48 indexed citations

7.

Barnfield, Sonia. (2009). Experiences of working in Kenya with VSO. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 11(1). 61–64.

8.

Barnfield, Sonia, Katharine Edey, & Stephen D. Keay. (2008). @ TOG. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 10(1). 68–69.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact