Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report
2018697 citationsAmy Peacock, Janni Leung et al.Addictionprofile →
Smoking Cessation and Severity of Weight Gain in a National Cohort
1991641 citationsRobert F. Anda, Gary A. Giovino et al.profile →
Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys
2012572 citationsGary A. Giovino, Samira Asma et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Gary A. Giovino
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gary A. Giovino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary A. Giovino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary A. Giovino more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary A. Giovino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary A. Giovino. The network helps show where Gary A. Giovino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gary A. Giovino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gary A. Giovino.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gary A. Giovino based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gary A. Giovino. Gary A. Giovino is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peacock, Amy, Janni Leung, Sarah Larney, et al.. (2018). Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. Addiction. 113(10). 1905–1926.697 indexed citations breakdown →
Malarcher, Ann, Carole S. Orleans, Cindy Tworek, et al.. (2006). Use of Cessation Methods Among Smokers Aged 16-24 Years – United States, 2003. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 55(50). 1351–1354.40 indexed citations
9.
Hyland, Andrew, Hamed Rezaishiraz, Joseph E. Bauer, Gary A. Giovino, & K. Michael Cummings. (2005). Characteristics of low‐level smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 7(3). 461–468.31 indexed citations
Wakefield, Melanie, Frank J. Chaloupka, Dianne C. Barker, et al.. (2000). Changes at the Point-of-Sale for Tobacco Following the 1999 Billboard Ban. Tobacco Control.5 indexed citations
Mannino, David M., Earl S. Ford, Gary A. Giovino, & Michael J. Thun. (1998). Lung cancer deaths in the United States from 1979 through 1992: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. International Journal of Epidemiology. 27(2).1 indexed citations
15.
Caraballo, Ralph S., Gary A. Giovino, Terry F. Pechacek, et al.. (1998). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Serum Cotinine Levels of Cigarette Smokers. JAMA.123 indexed citations
Fiore, Michael C., Thomas E. Novotny, John P. Pierce, et al.. (1990). Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. Do cessation programs help?. PubMed. 263(20). 2760–5.137 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.