Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report

697 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 697 indexed citations. Written by Amy Peacock, Janni Leung, Sarah Larney, Samantha Colledge‐Frisby, Matthew Hickman, Jürgen Rehm, Gary A. Giovino, Robert West, Wayne Hall and Paul Griffiths covering the research area of Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (235 citations), Pharmacology (132 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). Published in Addiction.

Countries where authors are citing Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/add.14234.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026