This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Phillips more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Phillips. The network helps show where Gail Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail Phillips.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail Phillips based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gail Phillips. Gail Phillips is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lindgren, Mia & Gail Phillips. (2014). Radio reinvented: the enduring appeal of audio in the digital age. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 36(2). 5–9.6 indexed citations
5.
Phillips, Gail, et al.. (2013). The framing of the global financial crisis 2005-2008: A cross-country comparison of the US, UK and Australia. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 35(2). 59–72.5 indexed citations
6.
Phillips, Gail. (2013). ERA 2012: Lose a battle, win the war - the future for journalism research. The Australian Journalism Review. 35(1). 7.3 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Michael D., et al.. (2012). Indigenous Voice Closing the Gap and Putting Communication for Social Change into Practice. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.4 indexed citations
Lindgren, Mia & Gail Phillips. (2011). Conceptualising journalism as research: Two paradigms. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 33(2). 73–83.9 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, Gail. (2009). Ethnic minorities in Australia’s television news: a second snapshot. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 31(1). 19.11 indexed citations
12.
Phillips, Gail, et al.. (2007). Australian television news trends. First results from a longitudinal study. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).6 indexed citations
13.
Phillips, Gail, et al.. (2007). Ethnic diversity in television news: an Australian case study. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 29(2). 15.6 indexed citations
14.
Phillips, Gail, et al.. (2006). Media Analysis Report - Journalism in multicultural Australia - Television News 2005. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).1 indexed citations
15.
Phillips, Gail & Mia Lindgren. (2006). Australian broadcast journalism 2nd ed.. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).2 indexed citations
16.
Tanner, Stephen, et al.. (2005). Journalism ethics at work. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).11 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, Gail, et al.. (2004). Birth of a station: the impact of Nova on the Perth radio market. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).
18.
Phillips, Gail & Mark Balnaves. (2002). The anarchic audience: a case study. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 24(1). 83.2 indexed citations
Andermann, Frédérick, et al.. (1978). Books Received. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 5(2). xvi–xvi.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.