GA Bray

428 citations
8 papers · 336 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Pharmacy top 5%
    • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Physiology top 10%
    • Diet and metabolism studies
    • Body Composition Measurement Techniques
    • Nutrition and Health in Aging

Papers in

    • Diet and metabolism studies 5
    • Thermoregulation and physiological responses 2
    • Body Composition Measurement Techniques 1
    • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 3

GA Bray

8 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

GA Bray
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Pharmacy 45
  • Physiology 217
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 46
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 50
  • Gastroenterology 14
Replace Joe Proietto with:
Joe Proietto Australia
Tiffany R. Beckman United States
L Sjöström Sweden
Patricia Bononi United States
Werd Al‐Najim Ireland
Sylka R. Geloneze Brazil
Alejandro Campos United States
Siren Nymo Norway
Meinders Ae Netherlands
A. De Francesco Italy
GA Bray relative to Joe Proietto Australia Joe Proietto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joe Proietto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by GA Bray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of GA Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GA Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GA Bray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by GA Bray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by GA Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by GA Bray. The network helps show where GA Bray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside GA Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with GA Bray Line = papers co-authored together GA Bray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 197675
2 199075
3 197773
4 199233
5 197730
6 199822
7 199714
8 199714

About GA Bray

GA Bray is a scholar working on Physiology, Surgery, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Rehabilitation, having authored 8 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (45 citations), Physiology (217 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (46 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (50 citations) and Gastroenterology (14 citations). GA Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John R. Benfield, Judith Rodin, R. E. Barry, Pietro Castelnuovo‐Tedesco, R. J. Morin, James P. DeLany, Barbara York, Ruth I. Wood, Frank L. Greenway and D. S. Gray. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Journal of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact