G. William Mercer

945 citations
31 papers · 729 indexed · h-index 15

G. William Mercer

30 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

G. William Mercer
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Clinical Psychology 198
  • Epidemiology 179
  • Physiology 160
  • Social Psychology 149
  • Sociology and Political Science 124
Replace Janet C’de Baca with:
Janet C’de Baca United States
Bosco Rowland Australia
Peter Larm Sweden
Jenny Hislop United Kingdom
Edna R. Fiedler United States
E Lang Australia
Rayman W. Bortner United States
Rosalina Richards New Zealand
Elisa R. Torres United States
Zoe Tonks Australia
G. William Mercer relative to Janet C’de Baca United States Janet C’de Baca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Janet C’de Baca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. William Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. William Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. William Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. William Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. William Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. William Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. William Mercer. The network helps show where G. William Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. William Mercer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. William Mercer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. William Mercer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. William Mercer. G. William Mercer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3
Design, development, and implementation of a positive psychology psycho-education curriculum with remand prisoners
1
4 116
5
A Cost/Benefit Analysis of a 5-Month Intensive Alcohol-Impaired Driving Road Check Campaign
7
6 55
7 28
8 5
9 24
10 168
11 38
12
ALCOHOL-RELATED CASUALTY TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA
4
13
COUNTERATTACK TRAFFIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 1984
4
14 19
15 17
16 2
17 22
18 43
19 3
20 31

About G. William Mercer

G. William Mercer is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Toxicology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (97 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (105 citations) and Applied Psychology (53 citations). G. William Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John D. Hundleby, Paul M. Kohn, Ed Cairns, Stephen Fleming, Richard A. Carpenter, Peter Cooper, J. Mark FitzGerald, C. Frank Ryan, Carlo A. Marra and David P. White. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Marriage and the Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026