G. W. Keeton
- Law top 2%
- Legal principles and applications 2
- Law in Society and Culture 2
- Criminal Law and Evidence 1
- Development top 10%
-
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction 4
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 1
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 1
-
- Medieval Literature and History 1
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
- Co-authors
- Georg SchwarzenbergerPeter E. JonesPatrick J. McGowanJ. Leo CefkinEdward McWhinneyC. B. BourneW. FriedmannJohn Cameron
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (1 paper)British Journal of Sociology (2 papers)International Affairs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
G. W. Keeton
22 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Law 57
- Development 19
- Political Science and International Relations 112
- Public Administration 9
- Sociology and Political Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Keeton
This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Keeton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Keeton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Keeton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Keeton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Keeton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Keeton. The network helps show where G. W. Keeton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside G. W. Keeton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shakespeare and his legal problems | 2009 | 0 |
| 2 | Keeton & Sheridan's The modern law of charities | 1992 | 0 |
| 3 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1976 | 84 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 6 | |
| 6 | Modern developments in the law of trusts | 1971 | 4 |
| 7 | 1968 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 10 | Lord Chancellor Jeffreys and the Stuart cause | 1965 | 4 |
| 11 | Guilty but insane | 1961 | 2 |
| 12 | Trial by tribunal : a study of the development and functioning of the Tribunal of Inquiry | 1960 | 2 |
| 13 | 1958 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 23 | |
| 16 | 1954 | 46 | |
| 17 | 1954 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1953 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 1 |
About G. W. Keeton
G. W. Keeton is a scholar working on Law, Museology and Classics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (4 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 paper), Criminal Law and Evidence (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (57 citations), Development (19 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (112 citations). G. W. Keeton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Georg Schwarzenberger, Peter E. Jones, Patrick J. McGowan, J. Leo Cefkin, Edward McWhinney, C. B. Bourne, W. Friedmann, John Cameron, William Huse Dunham and Werner Levi. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, British Journal of Sociology and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.