Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measurement of Bone Mineral in vivo: An Improved Method
1963617 citationsJohn Cameron, James A. Sorensonprofile →
[49] Rapid DNA isolations for enzymatic and hybridization analysis
1980548 citationsRonald W. Davis, Marjorie Thomas et al.Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymologyprofile →
Evidence for transposition of dispersed repetitive DNA families in yeast
1979507 citationsJohn Cameron, Ronald W. Davis et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Cameron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cameron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cameron more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cameron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cameron. The network helps show where John Cameron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Cameron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Cameron.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Cameron based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Cameron. John Cameron is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Palmer, I. D., N. G. Higgs, Z. A. Moschovidis, & John Cameron. (2005). How 3D Stresses Can Change the Standard Thick-Walled Cylinder Approach to Sand Prediction.2 indexed citations
Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammad Javad, M. Ghiassi-Nejad, Azam Niroomand‐Rad, P. Andrew Karam, & John Cameron. (2002). How Should Governments Address High Levels of Natural Radiation and Radon--Lessons from the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident and Ramsar, Iran. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester). 13(1). 4.16 indexed citations
Cameron, John, et al.. (2000). Wing feather mite infestations on passerine birds : season and ambient air temperature influence the distribution of Proctophyllodes stylifer across the wings of blue tits (Parus caeruleus).. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).2 indexed citations
Cameron, John, et al.. (1997). ¿Las asociaciones de granjeros y el desarrollo agrícola en Taiwan : su (ir)relevancia para otros contextos socio - políticos?. Americanae (AECID Library). 138–205.1 indexed citations
Cameron, John. (1989). JSP and JSD: the Jackson approach to software development (2nd ed). IEEE Press eBooks.20 indexed citations
16.
Cameron, John. (1988). A proposed model for imagination and creativity. 34(3).2 indexed citations
17.
Davis, Ronald W., Marjorie Thomas, John Cameron, et al.. (1980). [49] Rapid DNA isolations for enzymatic and hybridization analysis. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 65(1). 404–411.548 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.