G. W. Dawson

2.1k citations
48 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 26

G. W. Dawson

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

G. W. Dawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Insect Science 1.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 454
  • Plant Science 820
  • Molecular Biology 457
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
Replace M. A. Schuler with:
M. A. Schuler United States
A. Mudd United Kingdom
Claus Tittiger United States
Hajime SUGIE Japan
Grit Kunert Germany
Mika Zagrobelny Denmark
Kamlesh R. Chauhan United States
Andrew J. Forgash United States
A. J. Hick United Kingdom
J. D. Warthen United States
G. W. Dawson relative to M. A. Schuler United States M. A. Schuler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. A. Schuler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Dawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Dawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Dawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Dawson. The network helps show where G. W. Dawson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. W. Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. W. Dawson Line = papers co-authored together G. W. Dawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Physiochemical barriers as plant protectants against slugs (Gastropoda: Pulmonata)
19962
2 199653
3 199663
4 199615
5 199662
6 199529
7 199328
8
Cytochrome P-450 catalysed monoterpene hydroxylation in Nepeta mussinii
199217
9 199228
10
The identification and biological activity of the aggregation pheromone of Sitona lineatus.
199113
11 1991199
12 199088
13 199082
14 198924
15 198946
16 198879
17 198768
18
Plant compounds that synergise activity of the aphid alarm pheromone.
19862
19
Antifeedants: A new concept for control of barley yellow dwarf virus in winter cereals.
198614
20 198237

About G. W. Dawson

G. W. Dawson is a scholar working on Insect Science, Biochemistry and Plant Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (7 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (5 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (454 citations) and Plant Science (820 citations). G. W. Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John A. Pickett, C. M. Woodcock, L. J. Wadhams, D. C. Griffiths, A. J. Hick, A. Mudd, James G. Hamilton, R. M. Wallsgrove, Stephen F. Nottingham and Jim Hardie. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026