G Testa

25 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

G Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 201
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 143
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 94
  • Biochemistry 25
  • Neurology 47
Replace Phyllis Salzman with:
Phyllis Salzman United States
M. Ömer Bostanci Türkiye
Ramazan Kozan Türkiye
Daniel S. Feldman United States
Márta Thán Hungary
David Bettis United States
W. Raabe United States
Gülay Üzüm Türkiye
BoK. Siesj� Sweden
J. David Grimes Canada
G Testa relative to Phyllis Salzman United States Phyllis Salzman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Phyllis Salzman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Testa. The network helps show where G Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside G Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G Testa Line = papers co-authored together G Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197485
2 197467
3 198539
4 198239
5 198923
6
Brain-stem and cortical mechanisms in an animal model of generalized corticoreticular epilepsy.
197317
7 199716
8 198513
9 19799
10 19879
11 19816
12 19876
13
[Preliminary study on the use of acetylcarnitine in patients with mental deterioration].
19826
14 20135
15 19864
16 19744
17 19813
18
[Herpes of the larynx. Apropos of 3 cases].
19933
19 19782
20
[The infantile and prepuberal form of Huntington's chorea].
19692

About G Testa

G Testa is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (11 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (201 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (143 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations), Biochemistry (25 citations) and Neurology (47 citations). G Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Gloor, A Pellegrini, Andrea Pellegrini, Mario Ermani, Peter A. Gloor, A. Guberman, Leontino Battistin, Daniela Paccagnella, C. Angelini and Roberto Curro ́Dossi. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurology, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact