G. Tedó

420 total citations
23 papers, 292 citations indexed

About

G. Tedó is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Tedó has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 292 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 6 papers in Genetics and 5 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in G. Tedó's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers). G. Tedó is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers). G. Tedó collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Japan and United States. G. Tedó's co-authors include Ignacio R. Ipharraguerre, E. Roura, Brooke Humphrey, Pol Llonch, Xavier Manteca, José J. Pastor, Takeshi Mikami, F. Bargo, Chieko Kai and Eva Mainau and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Nutrition and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

G. Tedó

23 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Tedó Spain 10 129 92 82 64 56 23 292
Niina Airas Finland 6 190 1.5× 36 0.4× 17 0.2× 35 0.5× 7 0.1× 19 297
D. Strabel Switzerland 9 44 0.3× 33 0.4× 24 0.3× 108 1.7× 13 0.2× 15 407
A.G. Lymberopoulos Greece 14 33 0.3× 138 1.5× 12 0.1× 29 0.5× 38 0.7× 35 470
Hyun‐Joo Sohn South Korea 13 35 0.3× 35 0.4× 40 0.5× 16 0.3× 93 1.7× 35 669
J. D. J. Harding United Arab Emirates 12 67 0.5× 28 0.3× 47 0.6× 25 0.4× 40 0.7× 21 329
M.J. Owens United States 10 79 0.6× 76 0.8× 14 0.2× 91 1.4× 32 0.6× 17 338
Emily L. O’Reilly United Kingdom 10 221 1.7× 47 0.5× 9 0.1× 81 1.3× 25 0.4× 13 410
Erin M. Brannick United States 11 451 3.5× 103 1.1× 47 0.6× 64 1.0× 24 0.4× 18 611
Raquel Peña Spain 12 199 1.5× 41 0.4× 8 0.1× 137 2.1× 14 0.3× 21 315
R.D. McLaren New Zealand 11 41 0.3× 72 0.8× 13 0.2× 38 0.6× 36 0.6× 20 335

Countries citing papers authored by G. Tedó

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Tedó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Tedó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Tedó more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Tedó

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Tedó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Tedó. The network helps show where G. Tedó may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Tedó

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Tedó. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Tedó based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Tedó. G. Tedó is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pastor, José J., et al.. (2024). When the neighbors are noisy: effect of social challenge in collateral pens of stressed animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 11. 1433628–1433628. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pastor, José J., et al.. (2024). Physiology, gene expression, and behavior as potential indicators of oxidative stress in piglets. BMC Veterinary Research. 20(1). 471–471. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bach, À., Virginia Aragón, Marta Blanch, et al.. (2022). Potential of Oral Nanoparticles Containing Cytokines as Intestinal Mucosal Immunostimulants in Pigs: A Pilot Study. Animals. 12(9). 1075–1075. 4 indexed citations
4.
Pastor, José J., et al.. (2022). Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs. PLoS ONE. 17(5). e0266524–e0266524. 31 indexed citations
6.
Llonch, Pol, Eva Mainau, Ignacio R. Ipharraguerre, et al.. (2018). Chicken or the Egg: The Reciprocal Association Between Feeding Behavior and Animal Welfare and Their Impact on Productivity in Dairy Cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5. 305–305. 40 indexed citations
7.
Pulido, Rubén, F. Bargo, G. Tedó, et al.. (2018). A sensory additive alters grazing behavior and increases milk response to concentrate supplementation in dairy cows. Livestock Science. 214. 106–111. 5 indexed citations
8.
Tedó, G., A. Mereu, & F. Bargo. (2017). 154 Dose–response trial of an umami sensory additive in pig transition diets. Journal of Animal Science. 95(suppl_2). 73–73. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bargo, F., et al.. (2016). 1394 Dose-dependent effects of a sensory additive on the eating behavior of TMR-fed dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science. 94(suppl_5). 674–675. 1 indexed citations
10.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2015). Cromolyn-mediated improvement of intestinal barrier function is associated with enhanced piglet performance after weaning. BMC Veterinary Research. 11(1). 274–274. 12 indexed citations
11.
Ipharraguerre, Ignacio R., G. Tedó, D. Menoyo, et al.. (2013). Bile Acids Induce Glucagon-Like Peptide 2 Secretion with Limited Effects on Intestinal Adaptation in Early Weaned Pigs. Journal of Nutrition. 143(12). 1899–1905. 23 indexed citations
12.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2012). Effet de l’addition de L-valine sur la préférence alimentaire des porcelets avec différents statuts en valine.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 44. 197–198. 1 indexed citations
13.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2011). Les porcelets sevrés préfèrent les aliments avec un niveau élevé de L-Lys HCl, indépendamment de leur statut nutritionnel en lysine. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 43(3). 129–130. 1 indexed citations
14.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2011). Gene expression of the L-amino acid–sensing receptor T1R1/T1R3 changes in gut tissues of pigs in response to dietary protein. Journal of Animal Science. 89. 336–336. 3 indexed citations
15.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2010). Well-fed piglets prefer amino acids that elicit umami taste.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 88. 211–211. 3 indexed citations
16.
Levy, Julie K., P.C. Crawford, Kenji Motokawa, et al.. (2008). Differentiation of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccination, Infection, or Vaccination and Infection in Cats. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 22(2). 330–334. 23 indexed citations
17.
Tedó, G., et al.. (2008). Effet de l'aromatisation et de la stratégie de formulation sur les performances zootechniques des porcelets en post sevrage. 3 indexed citations
18.
Yanai, Tokuma, G. Tedó, Takeshi Mori, et al.. (1997). Histopathological features of canine distemper recently observed in Japan. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 116(4). 403–408. 20 indexed citations
19.
Iwatsuki, K., et al.. (1995). Immunohistochemical analysis of the lymphoid organs of dogs naturally infected with canine distemper virus. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 113(2). 185–190. 36 indexed citations
20.
Mori, Takeshi, N. Hirayama, Naoyuki Miyashita, et al.. (1994). The biological characterization of field isolates of canine distemper virus from Japan. Journal of General Virology. 75(9). 2403–2408. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026