G. T. Penfield

9 total papers · 970 total citations
5 papers, 671 citations indexed

About

G. T. Penfield is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. T. Penfield has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 671 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in G. T. Penfield's work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). G. T. Penfield is often cited by papers focused on Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). G. T. Penfield collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Mexico. G. T. Penfield's co-authors include Mark Pilkington, W. V. Boynton, D. A. Kring, A. R. Hildebrand, S. B. Jacobsen, William I. Rose, John W. Drexler, Peter B. Larson, P. B. Robertson and R. A. F. Grieve and has published in prestigious journals such as Geology, Bulletin of Volcanology and LPI.

In The Last Decade

G. T. Penfield

4 papers receiving 624 citations

Hit Papers

Chicxulub Crater: A possi... 1991 2026 2002 2014 1991 200 400 600

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
G. T. Penfield 351 319 314 213 55 5 671
José Manuel Grajales-Nishimura 341 1.0× 163 0.5× 375 1.2× 255 1.2× 49 0.9× 27 655
D. B. Patterson 343 1.0× 163 0.5× 286 0.9× 58 0.3× 43 0.8× 14 559
William S. Mitchell 220 0.6× 74 0.2× 237 0.8× 197 0.9× 43 0.8× 9 573
B. C. Schuraytz 320 0.9× 331 1.0× 465 1.5× 105 0.5× 61 1.1× 29 727
J. Morgan 341 1.0× 358 1.1× 484 1.5× 116 0.5× 26 0.5× 30 781
Maria Mafalda Costa 237 0.7× 173 0.5× 297 0.9× 367 1.7× 225 4.1× 11 779
Clément Ganino 142 0.4× 301 0.9× 328 1.0× 163 0.8× 54 1.0× 20 627
Sjerry van der Gaast 450 1.3× 121 0.4× 144 0.5× 272 1.3× 68 1.2× 8 765
T. L. Jackson 215 0.6× 248 0.8× 126 0.4× 338 1.6× 232 4.2× 18 758
Mario Tassinari 211 0.6× 484 1.5× 241 0.8× 136 0.6× 67 1.2× 11 626

Countries citing papers authored by G. T. Penfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. T. Penfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. T. Penfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. T. Penfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. T. Penfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. T. Penfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. T. Penfield. The network helps show where G. T. Penfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. T. Penfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. T. Penfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. T. Penfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. T. Penfield. G. T. Penfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026