J. Morgan

1.2k total citations
30 papers, 782 citations indexed

About

J. Morgan is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Morgan has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 782 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17 papers in Geophysics and 15 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in J. Morgan's work include Planetary Science and Exploration (16 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (15 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers). J. Morgan is often cited by papers focused on Planetary Science and Exploration (16 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (15 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers). J. Morgan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. J. Morgan's co-authors include N. A. Artemieva, M. Warner, P. J. Barton, D. Stöffler, Kevin A. Jones, Timothy J. Bralower, Tamara Goldin, Peter Morgan, Philippe Claeys and S. P. S. Gulick and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

J. Morgan

26 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Morgan United Kingdom 17 484 358 341 118 38 30 782
Elmar Buchner Germany 17 426 0.9× 459 1.3× 486 1.4× 92 0.8× 26 0.7× 83 827
José Manuel Grajales-Nishimura Mexico 12 375 0.8× 161 0.4× 340 1.0× 255 2.2× 59 1.6× 27 657
Clément Ganino France 8 331 0.7× 306 0.9× 142 0.4× 165 1.4× 54 1.4× 20 633
B. C. Schuraytz United States 13 465 1.0× 331 0.9× 320 0.9× 105 0.9× 24 0.6× 29 728
Erik Sturkell Sweden 15 150 0.3× 336 0.9× 334 1.0× 98 0.8× 53 1.4× 40 548
Jüri Plado Estonia 13 268 0.6× 196 0.5× 213 0.6× 41 0.3× 21 0.6× 50 507
G. T. Penfield United States 3 316 0.7× 319 0.9× 352 1.0× 214 1.8× 26 0.7× 5 674
J. C. Dann United States 10 685 1.4× 284 0.8× 151 0.4× 204 1.7× 17 0.4× 12 1.0k
Steven W. Anderson United States 11 418 0.9× 144 0.4× 334 1.0× 35 0.3× 17 0.4× 17 603
Marissa M. Tremblay United States 13 341 0.7× 48 0.1× 292 0.9× 123 1.0× 31 0.8× 33 580

Countries citing papers authored by J. Morgan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Morgan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Morgan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Morgan. The network helps show where J. Morgan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Morgan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Morgan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Morgan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Morgan. J. Morgan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sato, Honami, Akira Ishikawa, Ignacio Arenillas, et al.. (2025). Prolonged 187Os/188Os excursion implies hydrothermal influence after the Chicxulub impact in the Gulf of Mexico. Nature Communications. 16(1). 2901–2901.
2.
Morgan, J., et al.. (2022). The Chicxulub impact and its environmental consequences. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 3(5). 338–354. 47 indexed citations
3.
McCall, Naoma, S. P. S. Gulick, Brendon Hall, et al.. (2021). Orientations of planar cataclasite zones in the Chicxulub peak ring as a ground truth for peak ring formation models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 576. 117236–117236. 4 indexed citations
4.
Wittmann, A., Aaron J. Cavosie, Nicholas E. Timms, et al.. (2021). Shock impedance amplified impact deformation of zircon in granitic rocks from the Chicxulub impact crater. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 575. 117201–117201. 18 indexed citations
5.
Ormö, Jens, S. P. S. Gulick, Michael T. Whalen, et al.. (2021). Assessing event magnitude and target water depth for marine-target impacts: Ocean resurge deposits in the Chicxulub M0077A drill core compared. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 564. 116915–116915. 11 indexed citations
6.
Lyons, Shelby, Allison T. Karp, Timothy J. Bralower, et al.. (2020). Organic matter from the Chicxulub crater exacerbated the K–Pg impact winter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(41). 25327–25334. 46 indexed citations
7.
Whalen, Michael T., S. P. S. Gulick, Christopher M. Lowery, et al.. (2020). Winding down the Chicxulub impact: The transition between impact and normal marine sedimentation near ground zero. Marine Geology. 430. 106368–106368. 19 indexed citations
8.
Rasmussen, Cornelia, Daniel F. Stöckli, Rupa Chatterjee, et al.. (2019). Thermal History of Chicxulub's Peak Ring — Constraints from Zircon U-Pb and (U-Th)/He Double Dating. LPICo. 2136. 5081. 1 indexed citations
9.
Urrutia‐Fucugauchi, J., Ligia Pérez‐Cruz, J. Morgan, et al.. (2019). Peering inside the peak ring of the Chicxulub Impact Crater—its nature and formation mechanism. Geology Today. 35(2). 68–72.
10.
Rasmussen, Cornelia, Daniel F. Stöckli, A. E. Pickersgill, et al.. (2019). U-Pb memory behavior in Chicxulub's peak ring — Applying U-Pb depth profiling to shocked zircon. Chemical Geology. 525. 356–367. 19 indexed citations
11.
Neal, C. R., D. A. Kring, M. Schmieder, et al.. (2018). What Do Platinum Group Elements Reveal About the Formation of the Chicxulub Impact Basin. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2067.
12.
Morgan, J., et al.. (2018). Drilling the K-Pg Impact Crater: IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Results. LPICo. 81(2067). 6027.
13.
Morgan, J., N. A. Artemieva, Claire M. Belcher, et al.. (2013). K-Pg Wildfires: modeling, experiments and observations. EPSC. 1 indexed citations
14.
Morgan, J., N. A. Artemieva, & Tamara Goldin. (2013). Revisiting wildfires at the K‐Pg boundary. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 118(4). 1508–1520. 41 indexed citations
15.
Morgan, J., et al.. (2008). Structural uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact structure. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 113(B7). 31 indexed citations
16.
Grieve, R. A. F., W. U. Reimold, J. Morgan, Ulrich Riller, & Mark Pilkington. (2008). Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 43(5). 855–882. 62 indexed citations
17.
Gilmour, I., Mark A. Sephton, & J. Morgan. (2003). Organic Geochemistry of a Hydrocarbon-rich Calcarenite from the Chicxulub Scientific Drilling Program. Open Research Online (The Open University). 1771. 6 indexed citations
18.
Price, Colin & J. Morgan. (2000). Lithospheric structure north of Scotland--II. Poisson's ratios and waveform modelling. Geophysical Journal International. 142(3). 737–754. 12 indexed citations
19.
Morgan, J., et al.. (1996). Waveform inversion of deep seismic reflection data: the polarity of mantle reflections. Tectonophysics. 264(1-4). 235–247. 7 indexed citations
20.
Morgan, J., et al.. (1994). The polarity of deep seismic reflections from the lithospheric mantle: Evidence for a relict subduction zone. Tectonophysics. 232(1-4). 319–328. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026