Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Outcome Results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in Patients With Hypertension and NIDDM
1998603 citationsPatrizio Tatti, Marco Pahor et al.Diabetes Careprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G Strollo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Strollo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Strollo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Strollo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Strollo. The network helps show where G Strollo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Strollo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Strollo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Strollo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G Strollo. G Strollo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strollo, Felice, Carla Boitani, Sabrina Basciani, et al.. (2005). The pituitary-testicular axis in microgravity: analogies with the aging male syndrome.. PubMed. 28(11 Suppl Proceedings). 78–83.9 indexed citations
7.
Riondino, G, Andrea M. Isidori, Andrea Fabbri, et al.. (1999). Leptin changes in normal weight and obese women in pre- and post-menopausal conditions.. PubMed. 22(10 Suppl). 66–7.5 indexed citations
8.
Strollo, Felice, et al.. (1998). Hormonal adaptation to real and simulated microgravity.. PubMed. 5(1). P89–92.9 indexed citations
9.
Tatti, Patrizio, Marco Pahor, Robert P. Byington, et al.. (1998). Outcome Results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in Patients With Hypertension and NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 21(4). 597–603.603 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Strollo, Felice, G Riondino, Breanna N. Harris, et al.. (1998). The effect of microgravity on testicular androgen secretion.. PubMed. 69(2). 133–6.59 indexed citations
11.
Strollo, Felice, et al.. (1998). Indirect evidence of CNS adrenergic pathways activation during spaceflight.. PubMed. 69(8). 777–80.12 indexed citations
12.
Strollo, Felice, et al.. (1997). Changes in human adrenal and gonadal function onboard Spacelab.. PubMed. 4(2). P103–4.12 indexed citations
13.
Strollo, Felice, et al.. (1996). Endocrine Effects of Motion Sickness Experienced during Parabolic Flight. 390. 111–114.5 indexed citations
14.
Leggio, F, et al.. (1993). [The incidence and clinical significance of the echocardiographic finding of false chordae tendineae].. PubMed. 7(2). 102–5.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.