G. Scott Waterman
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Neal D. RyanBoris BirmaherDouglas E. WilliamsonLISA BALACHJames M. PerelAwais AftabUma RaoSatish Iyengar
- Topics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBiological PsychiatryJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G. Scott Waterman
17 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Clinical Psychology 269
- Psychiatry and Mental health 185
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
- Social Psychology 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
Countries citing papers authored by G. Scott Waterman
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Scott Waterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Scott Waterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Scott Waterman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Scott Waterman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Scott Waterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Scott Waterman. The network helps show where G. Scott Waterman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Scott Waterman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Scott Waterman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Scott Waterman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Scott Waterman. G. Scott Waterman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Does the Biopsychosocial Model Help or Hinder Our Efforts to Understand and Teach Psychiatry | 3 |
| 10 | 100 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | 99 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 6 |
About G. Scott Waterman
G. Scott Waterman is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, General Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (49 citations), Clinical Psychology (269 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (185 citations). G. Scott Waterman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neal D. Ryan, Boris Birmaher, Douglas E. Williamson, LISA BALACH, James M. Perel, Awais Aftab, Uma Rao, Satish Iyengar, Mary Beth Beaudry and Humberto Quintana. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.