Emily H. Feig

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Disease2018202620202023201850100150200250

Peers

Emily H. Feig
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Clinical Psychology 478
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 229
  • Applied Psychology 219
  • Social Psychology 196
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 150
Replace Matthew C. Whited with:
Matthew C. Whited United States
Shahrzad Mavandadi United States
Kyeongra Yang United States
Vera K. Tsenkova United States
Paul A. Dennis United States
Laura J. Fisher Australia
Misty A.W. Hawkins United States
Nadine Messerli‐Bürgy Switzerland
Emma Motrico Spain
Deborah Lee Young-Hyman United States
Emily H. Feig relative to Matthew C. Whited United States Matthew C. Whited's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Matthew C. Whited · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily H. Feig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily H. Feig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily H. Feig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily H. Feig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily H. Feig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily H. Feig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily H. Feig. The network helps show where Emily H. Feig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily H. Feig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily H. Feig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily H. Feig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily H. Feig. Emily H. Feig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 9
2 1
3 20
4 5
5 1
6 10
7 5
8 15
9 27
10 11
11 48
12 16
13 13
14 48
15
Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Diseasebreakdown →
283
16 21
17 19
18 53
19 121
20 39

About Emily H. Feig

Emily H. Feig is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (219 citations), Clinical Psychology (478 citations) and Pharmacy (106 citations). Emily H. Feig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jeff C. Huffman, Michael R. Lowe, Rosalba Hernández, Darwin R. Labarthe, Laura D. Kubzansky, Hayami K. Koga, Martin E. P. Seligman, Donald M. Lloyd‐Jones, Eric S. Kim and Shawn N. Katterman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026