G. Quispel

9.1k citations
211 papers · 4.8k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

G. Quispel

181 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

G. Quispel
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Numerical Analysis 1.7k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2.5k
  • Geometry and Topology 1.3k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 319
  • Religious studies 315
Replace Walter A. Strauss with:
Walter A. Strauss United States
John Toland United Kingdom
P. Winternitz Canada
D. H. Sattinger United States
George W. Bluman Canada
A. Ramani France
Morikazu Toda Japan
P. G. L. Leach South Africa
Nail H. Ibragimov Sweden
Richard Beals United States
G. Quispel relative to Walter A. Strauss United States Walter A. Strauss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.3×
Walter A. Strauss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Quispel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Quispel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Quispel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Quispel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Quispel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Quispel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Quispel. The network helps show where G. Quispel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Quispel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Quispel Line = papers co-authored together G. Quispel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 211 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002454
2 1999317
3 1987307
4 2008256
5 1989233
6 2012181
7 1988170
8 1983132
9 1987130
10 1982103
11 1984100
12 200698
13 199288
14 200973
15 199867
16 198462
17 199261
18 199159
19 199658
20 198254

About G. Quispel

G. Quispel is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Archeology, Religious studies, Geometry and Topology and Numerical Analysis, having authored 211 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (56 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (47 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (45 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (38 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (26 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (25 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (25 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (1.7k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2.5k citations), Geometry and Topology (1.3k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (319 citations) and Religious studies (315 citations). G. Quispel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Robert I. McLachlan, H.W. Capel, Frank Nijhoff, David McLaren, John A G Roberts, Carol Thompson, Nicolas Robidoux, Murray T. Batchelor, Brynjulf Owren and Elena Celledoni. Their work appears in journals such as Vigiliae Christianae, Physics Letters A, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and BIT Numerical Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact