G. Peer

1.2k citations
20 papers · 939 indexed · h-index 12

G. Peer

20 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

G. Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Internal Medicine 170
  • Hematology 499
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 71
  • Genetics 136
  • Immunology 245
Replace Glenn Peer with:
Glenn Peer United States
A. C. K. Chang United States
Wendy Livingstone Ireland
Christoph Caliezi Switzerland
Lisa M. Regan United States
Lynn K. Boshkov United States
Rachelle P. Davis Canada
K. W. Annie Bang Canada
Ben Saxon Australia
Sheldon C. Naiman Canada
G. Peer relative to Glenn Peer United States Glenn Peer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Glenn Peer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Peer. The network helps show where G. Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Peer Line = papers co-authored together G. Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20065
2 20013
3 2000256
4 19989
5 1998150
6 199739
7 199685
8 19962
9 199627
10 19962
11 199553
12 199557
13
Study of septic shock in the non-human primate: relationship of pathophysiological response to therapy with anti-TNF antibody.
199418
14 19941
15
Retrospective description and experimental reconstitution of three different responses of the baboon to lethal E. coli.
199415
16 199225
17 19923
18
Survival of primates in LD100 septic shock following therapy with antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF alpha).
1990177
19
Staphylococcus aureus-induced shock: a pathophysiologic study.
198811
20
[Effect of active movement on the lymph circulation of contracting tendons].
19521

About G. Peer

G. Peer is a scholar working on Hematology, Immunology, Genetics, Clinical Biochemistry and Nephrology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (8 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Complement system in diseases (3 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (170 citations), Hematology (499 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (71 citations), Genetics (136 citations) and Immunology (245 citations). G. Peer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Alvin Chang, Fletcher B. Taylor, Stanley D. Kosanke, Charles T. Esmon, G Ferrell, L. B. Hinshaw, T. E. Emerson, Zoltán Lászik, Shinichiro Kurosawa and Deborah J. Stearns-Kurosawa. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Shock, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and Journal of Neural Transmission.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026