Glenn Peer

1.2k citations
19 papers · 948 indexed · h-index 16

Glenn Peer

19 papers receiving 931 citations

Peers

Glenn Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Hematology 369
  • Internal Medicine 116
  • Immunology 358
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 74
  • Epidemiology 302
Replace JW ten Cate with:
JW ten Cate Netherlands
Cristina Lupu United States
G. Peer United States
F B Taylor United States
A. C. K. Chang United States
Lisa J. Toltl Canada
PM Jansen Netherlands
Christoph Caliezi Switzerland
Hideo Wada Japan
G Ferrell United States
Glenn Peer relative to JW ten Cate Netherlands JW ten Cate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
JW ten Cate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Peer. The network helps show where Glenn Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glenn Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glenn Peer Line = papers co-authored together Glenn Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201533
2 201331
3 2010150
4 20101
5 200769
6 200720
7 200753
8 200588
9 200453
10 200321
11 200133
12
Comparison of the responses of global tests of coagulation with molecular markers of neutrophil, endothelial, and hemostatic system perturbation in the baboon model of E. colisepsis--toward a distinction between uncompensated overt DIC and compensated non-overt DIC.
200117
13 200116
14 2001214
15 200021
16 20003
17 199615
18 19951
19 1992109

About Glenn Peer

Glenn Peer is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Immunology, Hematology, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (6 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (4 papers), Complement system in diseases (3 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (3 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (2 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (369 citations), Internal Medicine (116 citations), Immunology (358 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (74 citations) and Epidemiology (302 citations). Glenn Peer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Fletcher B. Taylor, Charles T. Esmon, Gary Ferrell, Cristina Lupu, Florea Lupu, Gary T. Kinasewitz, Lacramioara Ivanciu, Hua Zhu, Narcis I. Popescu and Alvin Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Shock, Blood, American Journal Of Pathology, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Molecular Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026