Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of G. P. Kuiper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. P. Kuiper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. P. Kuiper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. P. Kuiper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. P. Kuiper. The network helps show where G. P. Kuiper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. P. Kuiper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. P. Kuiper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. P. Kuiper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. P. Kuiper. G. P. Kuiper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1973). Interpretation of the Jupiter Red Spot, I.. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 9. 249–314.4 indexed citations
2.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1972). Lunar and Planetary Laboratory studies of Jupiter. II.. Sky and Telescope. 43. 75.13 indexed citations
3.
Kuiper, G. P., et al.. (1972). Comets: Scientific Data and Missions. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).14 indexed citations
4.
Kuiper, G. P., et al.. (1971). Extensive cloud activity on Mars.. International Astronomical Union Circular. 2358. 1.1 indexed citations
5.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1970). High Altitudes Sites and IR Astronomy. 8. 121.1 indexed citations
Kuiper, G. P.. (1966). Interpretation of the Ranger records. 24.9 indexed citations
11.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1966). Interpretation of Ranger VII Records. 4. 1–70.17 indexed citations
12.
Hartmann, W. K., et al.. (1963). Rectified lunar atlas - supplement number two to the photographic lunar atlas.. University of Arizona Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
13.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1963). PHOTOMETRY OF THE INFRARED SPECTRUM OF VENUS, 1-2.5 MICRONS. 11. 269–299.7 indexed citations
14.
Kuiper, G. P., et al.. (1962). An Infrared Stellar Spectrometer. 1. 119–127.5 indexed citations
15.
Kuiper, G. P. & Barbara M. Middlehurst. (1961). Planets and satellites. University of Chicago Press eBooks.498 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Kuiper, G. P., et al.. (1960). Photographic lunar atlas : based on photographs taken at the Mount Wilson, Lick, Pic du Midi, McDonald and Yerkes Observatories. University of Chicago Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1956). The Formation of the Planets, Part III. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 50. 105.6 indexed citations
18.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1954). The earth as a planet. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).146 indexed citations
19.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1952). Comets and the Dissipation of the Solar Nebula. 4. 361–385.1 indexed citations
20.
Kuiper, G. P.. (1951). On the Origin of the Solar System. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 37(1). 1–14.353 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.