G. Natho

410 citations
39 papers · 325 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 20
    • Botanical Studies and Applications 9
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 5
    • Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna 4
    • Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 4
    • Bryophyte Studies and Records 5
    • Lichen and fungal ecology 4
    • Botanical Research and Chemistry 4

G. Natho

34 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

G. Natho
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 238
  • Plant Science 209
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 43
  • Insect Science 39
  • Ecological Modeling 11
Replace K. Browicz with:
K. Browicz Poland
Viera Feráková Slovakia
María A. Negritto Chile
J. J. Spies South Africa
Hildemar Scholz Germany
Nicola M.G. Ardenghi Italy
Piotr Kosiński Poland
Donald L. Copes United States
Matthew R. Klooster United States
Eduardo Cires Spain
G. Natho relative to K. Browicz Poland K. Browicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
K. Browicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Natho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Natho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Natho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Natho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Natho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Natho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Natho. The network helps show where G. Natho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside G. Natho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Natho Line = papers co-authored together G. Natho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197780
2 197579
3 195927
4 199923
5 197721
6 197711
7 200011
8 20009
9 19905
10 19975
11 19794
12 19754
13 19914
14 19983
15 19823
16 19773
17
Morphologie und Systematik der Pflanzen
19902
18 19792
19 20082
20 19752

About G. Natho

G. Natho is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Insect Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (20 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (9 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (5 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (4 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (238 citations), Plant Science (209 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (43 citations), Insect Science (39 citations) and Ecological Modeling (11 citations). G. Natho has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Harald Schmidt, Riclef Grolle, Harry Schmidt, Christa E. Müller and Hans‐Werner Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Feddes Repertorium, Taxon and G. Fischer eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact