G. Melvyn Howe
- General Health Professions
- Health top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Graham MoonKelvyn JonesAndrew CliffNeil D. McGlashanDavid J. FoxMichael R. WardEleanor J. MacdonaldJ. A. Loraine
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers)Global Health Care Issues (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G. Melvyn Howe
38 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- General Health Professions 75
- Health 69
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 68
- Epidemiology 53
- Economics and Econometrics 43
Countries citing papers authored by G. Melvyn Howe
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Melvyn Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Melvyn Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Melvyn Howe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Melvyn Howe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Melvyn Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Melvyn Howe. The network helps show where G. Melvyn Howe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Melvyn Howe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Melvyn Howe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Melvyn Howe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Melvyn Howe. G. Melvyn Howe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | Spatial inequalities in mortality experience in Wales | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | A world geography of human diseases. | 50 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | CLASSIFICATION OF WORLD DESERT AREAS | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | THEORETICAL AND SYNOPTIC STUDIES OF LOW-LEVEL TROPICAL PERTURBATIONS. | 1 |
| 14 | A National Atlas of Disease Mortality in the United Kingdom. | 6 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About G. Melvyn Howe
G. Melvyn Howe is a scholar working on Health, Geography, Planning and Development and Forestry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (69 citations), Modeling and Simulation (19 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). G. Melvyn Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Graham Moon, Kelvyn Jones, Andrew Cliff, Neil D. McGlashan, David J. Fox, Michael R. Ward, Eleanor J. Macdonald, J. A. Loraine, Gerald F. Pyle and Michael J. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Lancet and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.