G. L. Spaeth

24 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers

G. L. Spaeth
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Ophthalmology 515
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 274
  • Surgery 71
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 65
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 64
Replace Andrew G. Iwach with:
Andrew G. Iwach United States
Anthony D.N. Murray South Africa
Baha’ N. Noureddin Lebanon
Daniele Doro Italy
Jonathan Herschler United States
Anselm G. Jünemann Germany
Kyoung Tak South Korea
Cengiz Akarsu Türkiye
Liliana Voinea Romania
Ufuk Elgin Türkiye
G. L. Spaeth relative to Andrew G. Iwach United States Andrew G. Iwach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew G. Iwach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. L. Spaeth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. L. Spaeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. L. Spaeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. L. Spaeth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. L. Spaeth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. L. Spaeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. L. Spaeth. The network helps show where G. L. Spaeth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. L. Spaeth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. L. Spaeth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. L. Spaeth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. L. Spaeth. G. L. Spaeth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 22
2 34
3
Detecting Glaucomatous Visual Field Change: A Comparison of the New Field Damage Likelihood Score (FDLS) with Existing Field Staging Systems
0
4 20
5 40
6 31
7 16
8
Neodymium-YAG transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. The role of pigmentation.
28
9 46
10 24
11 35
12 8
13
Evaluation of local anesthesia agents using a new force-sensitive lid speculum.
2
14 12
15 16
16
A comparison of antinuclear antibodies and DNA-binding antibodies in chronic open-angle glaucoma.
7
17 40
18 17
19
Pathogenesis of visual loss in patients with glaucoma. Pathologic and sociologic considerations.
15
20 45

About G. L. Spaeth

G. L. Spaeth is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oral Surgery, having authored 25 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (515 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (274 citations) and Neurology (59 citations). G. L. Spaeth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include V P Costa, Silvia Orengo-Nania, Richard A. Eiferman, Rohit Varma, R A Hitchings, Marlene R. Moster, Thomas W. Samuelson, Greg Gamble, Peter J. Savino and Helen V. Danesh‐Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026