Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hugo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hugo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hugo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hugo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hugo. The network helps show where G. Hugo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Hugo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Hugo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Hugo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Hugo. G. Hugo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hugo, G., et al.. (2015). The Southeast Asia-Australia regional migration system: some insights into the “new emigration”. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).1 indexed citations
2.
Hugo, G. & Kevin Harris. (2011). Population distribution effects of migration in Australia.20 indexed citations
Hugo, G.. (2011). Australia's changing population and the future. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).2 indexed citations
5.
Barrie, Helen, et al.. (2010). New technologies: Their potential role in linking rural older people to community. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).26 indexed citations
6.
Hugo, G., et al.. (2007). Marriage migration between Vietnam and Taiwan: A view from Vietnam. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).13 indexed citations
7.
Hugo, G.. (2006). Migration between Africa and Australia: Patterns, issues and implications. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).3 indexed citations
8.
Hugo, G.. (2005). Migration Policies in Australia and their Impact on Development in Countries of Origin. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).9 indexed citations
9.
Champion, Tony & G. Hugo. (2004). New forms of urbanization: beyond the urban-rural dichotomy..55 indexed citations
Hugo, G., et al.. (2001). Emigration from Australia: economic implications. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).27 indexed citations
Hugo, G.. (2001). What is happening in rural and regional populations. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).10 indexed citations
14.
Hugo, G.. (2001). Migration, urbanization and development: New directions and issues.. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).1 indexed citations
Hugo, G.. (1980). Indonesia: population distribution and redistribution.. PubMed. 7(13). 70–100.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.