G. Hampel

1.1k total citations
59 papers, 777 citations indexed

About

G. Hampel is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Hampel has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 777 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Radiation, 19 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 12 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in G. Hampel's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (17 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers). G. Hampel is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (17 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers). G. Hampel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. G. Hampel's co-authors include Astrid Pundt, Jürgen Hesse, Christian Schütz, S. Zauner, Helmut König, Harald Claus, B. Lüthi, Adam Campbell Anderson, Jens Volker Kratz and Michael Fricke and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

G. Hampel

55 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Hampel Germany 15 209 207 167 164 161 59 777
S. N. Chintalapudi India 15 39 0.2× 159 0.8× 60 0.4× 414 2.5× 224 1.4× 55 911
Luke L. Daemen United States 16 31 0.1× 122 0.6× 17 0.1× 295 1.8× 81 0.5× 44 747
Nasar Ahmed Pakistan 19 52 0.2× 46 0.2× 27 0.2× 145 0.9× 77 0.5× 62 932
T. Miki Japan 16 57 0.3× 72 0.3× 114 0.7× 114 0.7× 14 0.1× 50 680
Yasuharu Yoneda Japan 5 38 0.2× 307 1.5× 13 0.1× 349 2.1× 65 0.4× 11 891
V. K. Mathur United States 19 33 0.2× 205 1.0× 13 0.1× 708 4.3× 64 0.4× 84 1.1k
A. I. Nepomnyashchikh Russia 12 43 0.2× 142 0.7× 31 0.2× 281 1.7× 40 0.2× 69 446
Yoshihide Honda Japan 16 74 0.4× 191 0.9× 11 0.1× 148 0.9× 16 0.1× 61 820
Toshitaka Oka Japan 17 75 0.4× 103 0.5× 27 0.2× 251 1.5× 62 0.4× 99 931
Kohki Satoh Japan 16 19 0.1× 20 0.1× 232 1.4× 260 1.6× 143 0.9× 87 868

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hampel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hampel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hampel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hampel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hampel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hampel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hampel. The network helps show where G. Hampel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Hampel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Hampel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Hampel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Hampel. G. Hampel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marrale, Maurizio, et al.. (2015). Comparison of EPR response of alanine and Gd2O3-alanine dosimeters exposed to TRIGA Mainz reactor. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 106. 116–120. 18 indexed citations
2.
Peters, Tanja, et al.. (2015). Cellular uptake and in vitro antitumor efficacy of composite liposomes for neutron capture therapy. Radiation Oncology. 10(1). 52–52. 31 indexed citations
3.
Bassler, Niels, Hanna Koivunoro, Iiro Auterinen, et al.. (2014). The alanine detector in BNCT dosimetry: Dose response in thermal and epithermal neutron fields. Medical Physics. 42(1). 400–411. 21 indexed citations
4.
Palmans, Hugo, et al.. (2014). Confirmation of a realistic reactor model for BNCT dosimetry at the TRIGA Mainz. Medical Physics. 41(11). 111706–111706. 8 indexed citations
5.
Schütz, Christian, Christoph Brochhausen, G. Hampel, et al.. (2012). Intercomparison of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, quantitative neutron capture radiography, and prompt gamma activation analysis for the determination of boron in biological samples. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 404(6-7). 1887–95. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bassler, Niels, Jens Volker Kratz, Christian Schütz, et al.. (2011). Dose determination using alanine detectors in a mixed neutron and gamma field for boron neutron capture therapy of liver malignancies. Acta Oncologica. 50(6). 817–822. 9 indexed citations
7.
Kudějová, P., Christian Schütz, J. V. Kratz, et al.. (2011). Determination of boron concentration in blood and tissue samples from patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma using Prompt Gamma Ray Activation Analysis (PGAA). Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 69(7). 936–941. 11 indexed citations
8.
Kratz, Jens Volker, et al.. (2011). Dosimetric feasibility study for an extracorporeal BNCT application on liver metastases at the TRIGA Mainz. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 70(1). 139–143. 11 indexed citations
9.
Gerstenberg, H., et al.. (2011). Fast determination of impurities in metallurgical grade silicon for photovoltaics by instrumental neutron activation analysis. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 69(10). 1365–1368. 6 indexed citations
10.
Schütz, Christian, Christoph Brochhausen, S. Altieri, et al.. (2011). Boron Determination in Liver Tissue by Combining Quantitative Neutron Capture Radiography (QNCR) and Histological Analysis for BNCT Treatment Planning at the TRIGA Mainz. Radiation Research. 176(3). 388–396. 9 indexed citations
11.
Schütz, Christian, Jens Volker Kratz, Niels Bassler, et al.. (2010). Dose calculation in biological samples in a mixed neutron-gamma field at the TRIGA reactor of the University of Mainz. Acta Oncologica. 49(7). 1165–1169. 12 indexed citations
12.
Zauner, S., et al.. (2010). Biosorption of copper by wine-relevant lactobacilli. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 145(1). 126–131. 61 indexed citations
13.
Hampel, G., et al.. (2009). Determination of the irradiation field at the research reactor TRIGA Mainz for BNCT. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 67(7-8). S242–S246. 7 indexed citations
15.
Hampel, G., et al.. (2009). Irradiation facility at the TRIGA Mainz for treatment of liver metastases. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 67(7-8). S238–S241. 9 indexed citations
16.
Hampel, G., Κ. Eberhardt, & Ν. Trautmann. (2006). The Research Reactor TRIGA Mainz. 51(5). 6 indexed citations
17.
Burgkhardt, B., P. Bilski, M. Budzanowski, et al.. (2006). Application of different TL detectors for the photon dosimetry in mixed radiation fields used for BNCT. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 120(1-4). 83–86. 29 indexed citations
18.
Hampel, G., et al.. (2002). CALCULATION OF THE ACTIVITY INVENTORY FOR THE TRIGA REACTOR AT THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF HANNOVER (MHH) IN PREPARATION FOR DISMANTLING THE FACILITY. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
19.
Hampel, G.. (1997). Nonlinear Microwave Response of YBCO Films and Crystals. APS March Meeting Abstracts.
20.
Hampel, G., et al.. (1995). Radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel in vivo in a xenotransplanted human squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 121(S1). A53–A53. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026