G. Das

1.0k citations
89 papers · 750 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

G. Das

78 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers

G. Das
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Parasitology 149
  • Reproductive Medicine 169
  • Small Animals 124
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 120
  • Physiology 44
Replace Murray R. Woodbury with:
Murray R. Woodbury Canada
M. C. G. Davies Morel United Kingdom
Gholamreza Nikbakht Brujeni Iran
G.S. Amiridis Greece
Alexandre A. Tonin Brazil
Marko Samardžija Croatia
Bart Mateusen Belgium
David B. Galloway United Kingdom
G. Bilkei United States
Suneerat Aiumlamai Thailand
G. Das relative to Murray R. Woodbury Canada Murray R. Woodbury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Murray R. Woodbury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Das

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Das's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Das with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Das more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Das

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Das. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Das. The network helps show where G. Das may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Das, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Das Line = papers co-authored together G. Das links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200165
2 201656
3 199653
4 201850
5 201235
6 201031
7 201430
8 201627
9 199023
10 201421
11 200119
12 200818
13 200018
14 201718
15 200517
16 201416
17 200516
18
Comparative randomised controlled clinical trial of a herbal eye drop with artificial tear and placebo in computer vision syndrome.
200316
19 201414
20 201013

About G. Das

G. Das is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Parasitology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 89 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helminth infection and control (23 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers), Livestock Management and Performance Improvement (12 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (11 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (10 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (7 papers) and Parasites and Host Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (149 citations), Reproductive Medicine (169 citations), Small Animals (124 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (120 citations) and Physiology (44 citations). G. Das has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J.K. Prasad, Nihar Ranjan Biswas, Vandana Tripathi, Balamurugan Balusamy, S. K. Ghosh, Sarita Beri, S. Ghosh, Suresh K. Gupta, Nitin Kumar and Srikant Ghosh. Their work appears in journals such as Tropical Animal Health and Production, Parasitology Research, Theriogenology, Phytotherapy Research and Vaccine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact