G. D. Piearce

409 total citations
18 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

G. D. Piearce is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pharmacology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, G. D. Piearce has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Pharmacology and 5 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in G. D. Piearce's work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (4 papers). G. D. Piearce is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (4 papers). G. D. Piearce collaborates with scholars based in . G. D. Piearce's co-authors include D.N. Pegler, Peter Högberg, D. Gumbo, Leif Ryvarden, Charles Sharp, Peter Shaw and Cathy Sharp and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Ecology, Kew Bulletin and Mycologist.

In The Last Decade

G. D. Piearce

16 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

G. D. Piearce

PS

NLC

PHARM

EEBS

GPC

Daniel Thoen Belgium

Moussa Diabaté Guinea

André Laurênio de Melo Brazil

Marta L. Majewska Poland

T. H. Arnold South Africa

J. A. Vozzo United States

Kenneth Buchholz United States

M. Diouf Senegal

B.F. Rodrigues India

Heather L. Lindon United Kingdom

Daniel Thoen Belgium

G. D. Piearce

333 ×2.0

PS

130 ×1.5

NLC

94 ×1.2

PHARM

98 ×1.3

EEBS

38 ×0.8

GPC

Citations per year, relative to G. D. Piearce G. D. Piearce (= 1×) peers Daniel Thoen

Countries citing papers authored by G. D. Piearce

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. D. Piearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. D. Piearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. D. Piearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. D. Piearce

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. D. Piearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. D. Piearce. The network helps show where G. D. Piearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. D. Piearce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. D. Piearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. D. Piearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. D. Piearce. G. D. Piearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Sharp, Cathy & G. D. Piearce. (2000). VERNACULAR NAMES OF ZIMBABWEAN FUNGI: A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST. 17. 219–228. 1 indexed citations

2.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1994). Sooty baobabs - disease or drought?. 6 indexed citations

3.

Ryvarden, Leif, et al.. (1994). An introduction to the larger fungi of South Central Africa. 25 indexed citations

4.

Piearce, G. D.. (1992). A singular piece of vanity: Livingstone's tree at the Victoria falls. 95–99. 2 indexed citations

5.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1992). Thirty years of correlated curve trend management trials. 3 indexed citations

6.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1992). Coppicing ability of colophospermum mopane. 10 indexed citations

7.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1992). The Ecology and Management of Indigenous Forests in Southern Africa. 49 indexed citations

8.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1990). A review of forest entomology. 2 indexed citations

9.

Piearce, G. D.. (1987). The genus Termitomyces in Zambia. Mycologist. 1(3). 111–116. 27 indexed citations

10.

Högberg, Peter & G. D. Piearce. (1986). Mycorrhizas in Zambian Trees in Relation to Host Taxonomy, Vegetation Type and Successional Patterns. Journal of Ecology. 74(3). 775–775. 76 indexed citations

11.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1986). Forestry in Zambia's Western Province.. 431–435. 3 indexed citations

12.

Piearce, G. D.. (1985). Livingstone and fungi in tropical Africa. Bulletin of the British Mycological Society. 19(1). 39–50. 3 indexed citations

13.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1985). Vanderbylia ungulata and its medicinal use in Zambia. Bulletin of the British Mycological Society. 19(2). 124–125. 1 indexed citations

14.

Piearce, G. D.. (1981). Zambian mushrooms — Customs and folklore. Bulletin of the British Mycological Society. 15(2). 139–142. 14 indexed citations

15.

Piearce, G. D., et al.. (1980). THE APPEAL OF THE PINE BOLETESUILLUS GRANULATUSAS A NEW ZAMBIAN MUSHROOM. 1(2-3). 183–197. 2 indexed citations

16.

Pegler, D.N. & G. D. Piearce. (1980). The Edible Mushrooms of Zambia. Kew Bulletin. 35(3). 475–475. 79 indexed citations

17.

Piearce, G. D.. (1979). A New Vascular Wilt Disease and its Relationship to Widespread Decline of Pterocarpus angolensis in Zambia. 25(1). 37–45. 4 indexed citations

18.

Piearce, G. D.. (1979). The Use of Arboricides to Control Thicket Species in the Teak Forests of Zambia. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal. 44(4). 285–297. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact