Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation
2000494 citationsStacy McGaugh, James M. Schombert et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. D. Bothun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. D. Bothun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. D. Bothun more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. D. Bothun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. D. Bothun. The network helps show where G. D. Bothun may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. D. Bothun
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. D. Bothun.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. D. Bothun based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. D. Bothun. G. D. Bothun is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bothun, G. D., Wendy L. Freedman, P. Garnavich, Lucas M. Macri, & M. Richmond. (2000). An HST Cepheid Distance to NGC 2841. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 197.2 indexed citations
5.
Bothun, G. D.. (2000). Beyond the Hubble Sequence. S&T. 99(5). 36.1 indexed citations
6.
Bothun, G. D.. (1999). Cyberprof: The University in the Next Millennium.. 34(5). 16–17.4 indexed citations
7.
Bothun, G. D., et al.. (1999). GalCrash: N-body Simulations on the Student Desktop. AAS. 195.
8.
Bothun, G. D.. (1998). Distance Education: Effective Learning or Content-Free Credits?.. 21(2).12 indexed citations
Bothun, G. D.. (1996). Teaching via Electrons: Networked Courseware at the University of Oregon.. 19(4). 37–43.3 indexed citations
12.
Impey, C. D., David Sprayberry, G. D. Bothun, & M. J. Irwin. (1993). Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Local Universe. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 183.2 indexed citations
Mould, J. R., Joshua Roth, L. Staveley‐Smith, et al.. (1991). The Velocity Field of Clusters of Galaxies within 100 MPC.I. Southern Clusters. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 23. 1263.1 indexed citations
15.
Beers, Timothy C., Karl Gebhardt, J. P. Huchra, et al.. (1991). A Spatial and Kinematic Analysis of the Abell 400 Cluster of Galaxies. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 23. 974.1 indexed citations
Bothun, G. D., et al.. (1986). Extremely Low Surface Brightness Galaxies. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 958.1 indexed citations
19.
Heckman, Timothy M., E. P. Smith, G. D. Bothun, & Bruce Balick. (1984). Quasars as the Active Nuclei of Interacting Galaxies: A Spectroscopic Investigation. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 16. 481.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.