G. Coddens

590 total citations
40 papers, 443 citations indexed

About

G. Coddens is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Coddens has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 443 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Materials Chemistry, 14 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in G. Coddens's work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (8 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (6 papers). G. Coddens is often cited by papers focused on Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (8 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (6 papers). G. Coddens collaborates with scholars based in France, Belgium and Germany. G. Coddens's co-authors include M. Bienfait, E. Courtens, R. Vacher, J. G. Dash, Marie Foret, Michitaka Maruyama, J. Pelous, Véronique Receveur‐Brechot, Jeremy C. Smith and D. Durand and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

G. Coddens

38 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

G. Coddens
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 188
  • Materials Chemistry 176
  • Condensed Matter Physics 134
  • Spectroscopy 59
  • Molecular Biology 50
Replace J.J. Ullo with:
J.J. Ullo United States
Daniel Mariedahl Sweden
L. M. Matarrese United States
Charles Austen Angell United States
H. Stiller Germany
B. W. van de Waal Netherlands
M. Yu. Belyaev Russia
A. Bourdon France
C. R. Jones United States
Avni Jain United States
J.J. Ullo United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to G. Coddens
G. Coddens · 1×
Citations per year, relative to G. Coddens
G. Coddens · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by G. Coddens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Coddens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Coddens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Coddens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Coddens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Coddens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Coddens. The network helps show where G. Coddens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Coddens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Coddens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Coddens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Coddens. G. Coddens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3
A proposal to get some common-sense intuition for the paradox of the double-slit experiment
2
4 4
5 1
6 1
7 7
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 2
12 7
13 1
14 54
15 1
16 2
17 4
18 8
19 9
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026