G. A. Forbes
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karen A. GarrettRobert J. HijmansWilliam E. FryM. E. OrdoñezJorge Andrade-PiedraJonathan YuenPedro J. OyarzúnPeter Kromann
- Topics
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance (81 papers)Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (57 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (43 papers)
- Partner nations
- PeruUnited StatesKenya
In The Last Decade
G. A. Forbes
106 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Plant Science 2.6k
- Cell Biology 1.0k
- Food Science 629
- Molecular Biology 400
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 156
Countries citing papers authored by G. A. Forbes
This map shows the geographic impact of G. A. Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. A. Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. A. Forbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. A. Forbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. A. Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. A. Forbes. The network helps show where G. A. Forbes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. A. Forbes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. A. Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. A. Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. A. Forbes. G. A. Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Life cycle comparison of industrial-scale lithium-ion battery recycling and mining supply chainsbreakdown → | 49 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 133 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Efficacy of fungicides against Phytophthora infestans in potato under laboratory and field conditions. | 7 |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | A Review of Sorghum Grain Mold | 55 |
| 19 | Assessment of sorghum grain mould: disease severity and crop loss | 14 |
| 20 | Screening for resistance to bacterial stripe on sorghum with dried infested leaf material. | 1 |
About G. A. Forbes
G. A. Forbes is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science and Food Science, having authored 107 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (81 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (57 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (43 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.6k citations), Cell Biology (1.0k citations) and Horticulture (44 citations). G. A. Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in Peru, United States and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Karen A. Garrett, Robert J. Hijmans, William E. Fry, M. E. Ordoñez, Jorge Andrade-Piedra, Jonathan Yuen, Pedro J. Oyarzún, Peter Kromann, Thomas S. Walker and Adam Sparks. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.